Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Confrontation Clause (3)
- Crawford v. Washington (3)
- Sixth Amendment (3)
- Admissibility (2)
- Cross-examination (2)
-
- Hearsay (2)
- Ohio v. Roberts (2)
- Reliability (2)
- Testimony (2)
- Witnesses (2)
- Confessions (1)
- Exclusions (1)
- Fisher (Jeff) (1)
- History (1)
- Massiah v. United States 377 US 201 (1964) (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966) (1)
- National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) (1)
- Probative value (1)
- Raleigh Case (1)
- Right-to-counsel (1)
- Testimonial (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Voluntariness test (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Mold That Shapes Hearsay Law, Richard D. Friedman
The Mold That Shapes Hearsay Law, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In response to an article previously published in the Florida Law Review by Professor Ben Trachtenberg, I argue that the historical thesis of Crawford v. Washington is basically correct: The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment reflects a principle about how witnesses should give testimony, and it does not create any broader constraint on the use of hearsay. I argue that this is an appropriate limit on the Clause, and that in fact for the most part there is no good reason to exclude nontestimonial hearsay if live testimony by the declarant to the same proposition would be admissible. I …
The Story Of Crawford, Richard D. Friedman
The Story Of Crawford, Richard D. Friedman
Book Chapters
Michael Crawford had been charged with assault. At his trial, the prosecution offered a statement made in the police station on the night of the incident by Crawford's wife Sylvia, who did not testify at trial. He objected, in part on the ground that this violated his right under the Confrontation Clause. The trial court nevertheless admitted the statement, and Crawford was convicted. The Washington Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the judgment. In rejecting the Confrontation Clause challenge, that court purported to apply the then governing doctrine of Ohio v. Roberts, under which the Clause posed no obstacle to admissibility if …
The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted And Transformed, Richard D. Friedman
The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted And Transformed, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
For several centuries, prosecution witnesses in criminal cases have given their testimony under oath, face to face with the accused, and subject to cross-examination at trial. The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the procedure, providing that ‘‘[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witness against him.’’ In recent decades, however, judicial protection of the right has been lax, because the U.S. Supreme Court has tolerated admission of outof- court statements against the accused, without cross-examination, if the statements are deemed ‘‘reliable’’ or ‘‘trustworthy.’’ …
Confessions, Yale Kamisar
Confessions, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
The entry for 'Confessions' in the Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, 1983