Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- "Amanda Walsh" (1)
- "Andrea Hansen" (1)
- "Andrew T. Miltenberg" (1)
- "Angela Carr" (1)
- "Caitlyn Horbert" (1)
-
- "Claire K. Hall" (1)
- "David Logan" (1)
- "Education Amendments Act of 1972" (1)
- "Jen Stanley" (1)
- "Jennifer Gentile Long" (1)
- "Lynette Labinger" (1)
- "Nancy Chi Cantalupo" (1)
- "Steven M. Richard" (1)
- "Susan Kruth" (1)
- "Tiffany Gaffney" (1)
- Accused (1)
- Allegations (1)
- Attorney (1)
- Boston (1)
- Brown (1)
- Burden (1)
- Calibrating (1)
- Career (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Colleague (1)
- College (1)
- Color (1)
- Complaining (1)
- Compliance-oriented (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Law Symposium: Adjudicating Sexual Misconduct On Campus: Title Ix And Due Process In Uncertain Times, Roger Williams University School Of Law, Michael M. Bowden
Law Symposium: Adjudicating Sexual Misconduct On Campus: Title Ix And Due Process In Uncertain Times, Roger Williams University School Of Law, Michael M. Bowden
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Immigration Unilateralism And American Ethnonationalism, Robert L. Tsai
Immigration Unilateralism And American Ethnonationalism, Robert L. Tsai
Faculty Scholarship
This paper arose from an invited symposium on "Democracy in America: The Promise and the Perils," held at Loyola University Chicago School of Law in Spring 2019. The essay places the Trump administration’s immigration and refugee policy in the context of a resurgent ethnonationalist movement in America as well as the constitutional politics of the past. In particular, it argues that Trumpism’s suspicion of foreigners who are Hispanic or Muslim, its move toward indefinite detention and separation of families, and its disdain for so-called “chain migration” are best understood as part of an assault on the political settlement of the …
Uncovering Juror Racial Bias, Christian Sundquist
Uncovering Juror Racial Bias, Christian Sundquist
Articles
The presence of bias in the courtroom has the potential to undermine public faith in the adversarial process, distort trial outcomes, and obfuscate the search for justice. In Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held for the first time that the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments required post-verdict judicial inquiry in criminal cases where racial bias clearly served as a “significant motivating factor” in juror decision-making. Courts will nonetheless likely struggle in interpreting what constitutes a "clear statement of racial bias" and whether such bias constituted a "significant motivating factor" in a juror's verdict. This Article will examine how …