Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Police (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- California (1)
-
- California Court of Appeal (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
- California v. Ciraolo (1)
- Cell phones (1)
- Co-Occupant (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Consent (1)
- Cotenant (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Digital Receiver Technology (1)
- Dirtboxes (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Electronic surveillance (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fernandez v. California (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Florida v. Riley (1)
- Georgia v. Randolph (1)
- Katz v. United States (1)
- Massiah v. United States (1)
- Matlock (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Occupant (1)
- Officers (1)
- Privacy (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Future Of Confession Law: Toward Rules For The Voluntariness Test, Eve Brensike Primus
The Future Of Confession Law: Toward Rules For The Voluntariness Test, Eve Brensike Primus
Michigan Law Review
Confession law is in a state of collapse. Fifty years ago, three different doctrines imposed constitutional limits on the admissibility of confessions in criminal cases: Miranda doctrine under the Fifth Amendment, Massiah doctrine under the Sixth Amendment, and voluntariness doctrine under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. But in recent years, the Supreme Court has gutted Miranda and Massiah, effectively leaving suspects with only voluntariness doctrine to protect them during police interrogations. The voluntariness test is a notoriously vague case-by-case standard. In this Article, I argue that if voluntariness is going to be the framework for …
Spies In The Skies: Dirtboxes And Airplane Electronic Surveillance, Brian L. Owsley
Spies In The Skies: Dirtboxes And Airplane Electronic Surveillance, Brian L. Owsley
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
Electronic surveillance in the digital age is essentially a cat-and-mouse game between governmental agencies that are developing new techniques and technologies for surveillance, juxtaposed against privacy rights advocates who voice concerns about such technologies. In November 2014, there was a discovery of a new twist on a relatively old theme. Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Marshals Service was running a surveillance program employing devices—dirtboxes—that gather all cell phone numbers in the surrounding area. Other federal agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Agency, Immigration and Custom Enforcement, and the Department of Homeland Security, are also documented to have …
Storming The Castle: Fernandez V. California And The Waning Warrant Requirement, Joshua Bornstein
Storming The Castle: Fernandez V. California And The Waning Warrant Requirement, Joshua Bornstein
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.