Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Automatic standing rule (1)
- Automobile (1)
- Child abuse (1)
- Child victims (1)
-
- Child witnesses (1)
- Children as witnesses (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Coy v. Iowa (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Cross-examination (1)
- Disability insurance (1)
- Due process of law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Lawful custodial arrest (1)
- Passmore v. Astrue (1)
- Possessory crimes (1)
- Prosecutorial self-contradiction (1)
- Sexual abuse (1)
- Sixth amendment (1)
- Social Security (1)
- Standing (1)
- Suppression hearing (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Warrantless search (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
There But For The Grace Of God Go I: The Right Of Cross-Examination In Social Security Disability Hearings , Bradley S. Dixon
There But For The Grace Of God Go I: The Right Of Cross-Examination In Social Security Disability Hearings , Bradley S. Dixon
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
United States V. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence Of Automatic Standing, William C. Bollard
United States V. Salvucci: The Problematic Absence Of Automatic Standing, William C. Bollard
Pepperdine Law Review
The United States Supreme Court recently abolished the automatic standing rule in United States v. Salvucci. The author analyzes the difficulties created for the criminal defendant charged with a possessory crime. In particular, this note focuses on the inequitable position the defendant is placed in when his suppression hearing testimony is used as a tool to impeach subsequent testimony offered at trial. The author continues by pointing out that the "prosecutorial self-contradiction," sought to be abolished in Salvucci, remains a part of our present judicial system. In conclusion, the author offers several considerations that will necessarily be an integral part …
New York V. Belton: The Scope Of Warrantless Searches Extended, Glenn D. Forcucci
New York V. Belton: The Scope Of Warrantless Searches Extended, Glenn D. Forcucci
Pepperdine Law Review
The United States Supreme Court, in New York v. Belton, expanded the area in which a policeman may search after he has made a lawful custodial arrest. In so ruling, the Supreme Court dramatically departed from its previous holding in Chimel v. California. While Chimel limited the area of the search to the area "within the immediate control of the arrestee," Belton allowed a search outside of that established boundary, as the Supreme Court allowed the search to include the passenger compartment of an automobile which the arrestee had not occupied.
Coy V. Iowa: A Constitutional Right Of Intimidation, John A. Mayers
Coy V. Iowa: A Constitutional Right Of Intimidation, John A. Mayers
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.