Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accession (1)
- Affirmative defense (1)
- Anschuetz (1)
- Bosnian Genocide decision (1)
- Civil (1)
-
- Comity (1)
- Commercial (1)
- Commercial impracticability (1)
- Commission (1)
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1)
- Corporate governance (1)
- Court of Appeal (1)
- Dayton Accords (1)
- Deposition (1)
- Discovery (1)
- EU (1)
- English (1)
- European Union (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal Rule 28(b)(1) (1)
- Federal Rule 28(b)(2) (1)
- Federal Rule 29 (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Foreign authorities (1)
- Genocide (1)
- Genocide Convention (1)
- Germany (1)
- Hague Convention (1)
- Hague Evidence Convention (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
To Understand Us V. Microsoft, Consider 'Acme V. Shamrock', Peter B. Rutledge, Amanda W. Newton
To Understand Us V. Microsoft, Consider 'Acme V. Shamrock', Peter B. Rutledge, Amanda W. Newton
Popular Media
The February 27, 2018, Supreme Court argument in United States v. Microsoft Corp. raises profound questions about issues of executive power, corporate governance, technology, judicial power and international affairs. At stake for the government is the scope of its investigative authority to obtain information located in a foreign country, irrespective of that country’s laws. At stake for Microsoft is its ability to organize its international corporate affairs and the predictability of the laws that will govern those affairs. This article analyzes the potential effects of this critical Supreme Court case.
Obtaining International Judicial Assistance Under The Federal Rules And The Hague Convention On The Taking Of Evidence Abroad In Civil And Commercial Matters: An Exposition Of The Procedures And A Practical Example: In Re Westinghouse Uranium Contract Litigation, Robert J. Augustine
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Hague Evidence Convention: A Practical Guide To The Convention, United States Case Law, Convention - Sponsored Review Commissions (1978 And 1985), And Responses Of Other Signatory Nations: With Digest Of Cases And Bibliography, Denise L. Dunham
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
When Skeletons Come Out Of The Closet: Implications Of The Bosnian Genocide Decision For Serbia's Eventual Eu Accession, Edina Slomic
When Skeletons Come Out Of The Closet: Implications Of The Bosnian Genocide Decision For Serbia's Eventual Eu Accession, Edina Slomic
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Discovery, Judicial Assistance And Arbitration: A New Tool For Cases Involving U.S. Entities?, Peter B. Rutledge
Discovery, Judicial Assistance And Arbitration: A New Tool For Cases Involving U.S. Entities?, Peter B. Rutledge
Scholarly Works
Limited discovery is one of the regularly cited advantages of international arbitration, as opposed to international litigation, particularly in contrast to litigation in the US. courts. Recent decisions by US. courts, however, have threatened to upend this comparative advantage. Invoking a little known US. law, 28 U.S.C. section 1782, these courts have permitted parties in an arbitration to petition for subpoenas issued by US. courts against their adversaries or third parties. Bucking the trend in the academic literature, which largely supports this development, this article opposes reading section 1782 to authorize subpoenas in support of an arbitration. Not only does …