Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abuse (1)
- Addicted (1)
- Alcohol (1)
- Baby (1)
- Birth (1)
-
- Born (1)
- Child (1)
- Cocaine (1)
- Confidential (1)
- Court (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Drug (1)
- Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (1)
- Fetus (1)
- Infant (1)
- Intrauterine (1)
- Law (1)
- Legal (1)
- Medical (1)
- Mother (1)
- Narcotic (1)
- Neglect (1)
- Neonatal (1)
- Neonate (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Pregnant (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Report (1)
- Substance (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Medical Evidence In Cases Of Intrauterine Drug And Alcohol Exposure , Judith Larsen, Robert M. Horowitz, Ira J. Chasnoff
Medical Evidence In Cases Of Intrauterine Drug And Alcohol Exposure , Judith Larsen, Robert M. Horowitz, Ira J. Chasnoff
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Diaz: The Gap Between Medication And Restoration, Bryson Mccollum
United States V. Diaz: The Gap Between Medication And Restoration, Bryson Mccollum
Mercer Law Review
In United States v. Diaz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in a case of first impression, determined whether the state met its burden in applying the United States Supreme Court's test articulated in Sell v. United States, to involuntarily medicate an incompetent, schizophrenic defendant. Based on the Sell test that was established in 2003, the court of appeals had to determine which evidentiary findings were sufficient to meet the clear and convincing evidence standard allowing the State of Georgia to forcibly medicate the appellant, Michael Diaz. The court of appeals found no clear …