Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Civil rights (2)
- Exclusionary Rule (2)
- Probable cause (2)
- 2006 (1)
-
- Arrest (1)
- Attorney fee (1)
- Attorneys' fees (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Rights (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Crime mapping (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Damages (1)
- Data driven policing (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Excessive force (1)
- Exclusionary rule (Evidence) (1)
- Garner (1)
- Garner instructions (1)
- High crime area (1)
- High drug area (1)
- High-crime (1)
- Hudson v. Michigan (1)
- Jones v. Bock (1)
- Knock & announce rule (Searches & seizures) (1)
- Knock and Announce (1)
- Knock and announce rule (1)
- Law Enforcement (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The 'High Crime Area' Question: Requiring Verifiable And Quantifiable Evidence For Fourth Amendment Reasonable Suspicion Analysis, Andrew Ferguson, Damien Bernache
The 'High Crime Area' Question: Requiring Verifiable And Quantifiable Evidence For Fourth Amendment Reasonable Suspicion Analysis, Andrew Ferguson, Damien Bernache
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This article proposes a legal framework to analyze the "high crime area" concept in Fourth Amendment reasonable suspicion challenges.Under existing Supreme Court precedent, reviewing courts are allowed to consider that an area is a "high crime area" as a factor to evaluate the reasonableness of a Fourth Amendment stop. See Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000). However, the Supreme Court has never defined a "high crime area" and lower courts have not reached consensus on a definition. There is no agreement on what a "high-crime area" is, whether it has geographic boundaries, whether it changes over time, whether it …
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation From The October 2006 Term, Martin Schwartz
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation From The October 2006 Term, Martin Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constable Blunders But Isnt Punished Does Hudson V Michigans Abolition Of The Exclusionary Rule Extend Beyond Knockandannounce Violations, Mark A. Summers
The Constable Blunders But Isnt Punished Does Hudson V Michigans Abolition Of The Exclusionary Rule Extend Beyond Knockandannounce Violations, Mark A. Summers
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Alternatives To The Exclusionary Rule After Hudson V. Michigan: Preventing And Remedying Police Misconduct, Alicia M. Hilton
Alternatives To The Exclusionary Rule After Hudson V. Michigan: Preventing And Remedying Police Misconduct, Alicia M. Hilton
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Waiting For The Other Shoe: Hudson And The Precarious State Of Mapp, David A. Moran
Waiting For The Other Shoe: Hudson And The Precarious State Of Mapp, David A. Moran
Articles
I have no idea whether my death will be noted in the New York Times. But if it is, I fear the headline of my obituary will look something like: "Professor Dies; Lost Hudson v. Michigan' in Supreme Court, Leading to Abolition of Exclusionary Rule." The very existence of this Symposium panel shows, I think, that my fear is well-grounded. On the other hand, I am not quite as fearful that Hudson foreshadows the complete overruling of Mapp v. Ohio2 and Weeks v. United States3 as I was when I published an article just three months after the Hudson decision …