Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (2)
- Index (2)
- Adoption (1)
- Bland v. Warwickshire (1)
- Bradley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1)
-
- Carney v. Sears (1)
- Child support (1)
- Child welfare records (1)
- Civil litigation (1)
- Civil sanctions (1)
- Commissioner v. Lo Bue (1)
- Commonwealth v. Coyle (1)
- Cullingworthv. Pollard (1)
- Custody (1)
- Doulgeris v. Bambacus Administrator (1)
- Equitable distribution (1)
- Escobedo v. Illinois (1)
- Family law (1)
- Foster children (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Gramelspacher v. Gramelspacher (1)
- Independent tort (1)
- James v. Commonwealth (1)
- Jones v. Murphy (1)
- Lackey v. Brooks (1)
- Massie v. Firmstone (1)
- Mefford v. State (1)
- Messiah v. United States (1)
- Miller v. Simpson (1)
- Paternity testing (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Where Are The Records? Handling Lost/Destroyed Records In Child Welfare Tort Litigation, Dale Margolin Cecka
Where Are The Records? Handling Lost/Destroyed Records In Child Welfare Tort Litigation, Dale Margolin Cecka
Law Faculty Publications
As child welfare professionals, we have all encountered the “missing” record, most often during day-to-day advocacy. For those who practice child welfare tort litigation, incomplete discovery is also common, even though case records can be critical in determining negligence or malfeasance. In other forms of civil litigation, judges are asked to hold parties accountable for losing or destroying records, and juries are allowed to draw negative inferences about the missing evidence. In contrast, an investigation of child welfare torts reveals that when a defending agency fails to produce credible records, the issue is simply not litigated or does not affect …
Family Law, Elizabeth P. Coughter, Ronald R. Tweel
Family Law, Elizabeth P. Coughter, Ronald R. Tweel
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Paternity - The New Test, J. Rodney Johnson
Proof Of Paternity - The New Test, J. Rodney Johnson
Law Faculty Publications
The true identity of a child's father has been the subject of speculation in many a case, literally speaking, as far back as the memory of man runneth. And, the rather obvious social problem giving occasion to this speculation refuses to remain a facet of our moral history. Indeed, if statistics relating to the number of illegitimate births in the United States can be viewed as a valid indicator of the magnitude of this problem of speculative paternity in contemporary times, the problem has never been greater.
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the case law from 1965.
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This article provides a list of the recent cases and their summaries for the year of 1963.