Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Sixth Amendment (2)
- Adjudicatory hearing (1)
- Compulsory Process Clause (1)
- Compulsory process (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
-
- Criminal Courts (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Davis v. Alaska (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Dispositional hearing (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- Gault (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Illegally obtained statements (1)
- Juvenile court (1)
- Miranda warnings (1)
- Ohio Rules of Juvenile Procedure (1)
- Subpeonas (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Videotape (1)
- Witnesses (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Compulsory Process Ii, Peter Westen
Compulsory Process Ii, Peter Westen
Michigan Law Review
This Article examines the validity of the conventional wisdom. It draws support for its analysis from the constitutional principles of compulsory process, and, in their absence, from related doctrine in the areas of a defendant's right to confront witnesses against him and his right to a fair trial. Part I of the article defines the constitutional standard that governs the simple case of a nonindigent defendant who makes a timely application to produce a witness from within the territory of the jurisdiction. Parts II through IV, in turn, examine that standard in the light of complicating factors such as the …
Constitutional Restraints On The Exclusion Of Evidence In The Defendant's Favor: The Implications Of Davis V. Alaska, Michigan Law Review
Constitutional Restraints On The Exclusion Of Evidence In The Defendant's Favor: The Implications Of Davis V. Alaska, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note, first, examines the Davis methodology for determining whether a foreclosed line of cross-examination warrants protection by the confrontation clause, and suggests a test employable by reviewing courts for making that determination. Then, the Note sketches the contours of the clash, prefigured by Davis, between the right of confrontation and the limitations on cross-examination that result from both the assertion of testimonial privileges and trial court relevance rulings.
An Assessment Of Videotape In The Criminal Courts, Ernest H. Short, B. Thomas Florence, Mary Alice Marsh
An Assessment Of Videotape In The Criminal Courts, Ernest H. Short, B. Thomas Florence, Mary Alice Marsh
BYU Law Review
Summary of Contents
I. Introduction
A. A brief history of television and videotape in the justice system
B. Recent studies of videotape technology in the justice system
C. Overview of the goals and methodology of the present study
II. The Videotape System
A. The recording environment
1. Lighting
2. Spatial arrangement
3. Participant mobility
4. Acoustics
5. Electrical power
B. Production techniques
1. Video source location
2. Audio source location
3. Picture composition
a. Zooms
b. Varying video sources
c. Special effects
C. Alternative equipment combinations
1. System 1 : the single camera
2. System 2: the single camera with …
Criminal Procedure--Discovery--Movement Toward Full Disclosure, Richard B. Pyles
Criminal Procedure--Discovery--Movement Toward Full Disclosure, Richard B. Pyles
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding Defendant's Discovery: The Jencks Act At Pretrial Hearings, David B. Olney
Expanding Defendant's Discovery: The Jencks Act At Pretrial Hearings, David B. Olney
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings In Ohio: Due Process And The Hearsay Dilemma, Sara E. Strattan
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings In Ohio: Due Process And The Hearsay Dilemma, Sara E. Strattan
Cleveland State Law Review
This comment will explore the extent to which the exclusion of hearsay evidence in a delinquency proceeding is a practical reality in the Ohio system. In so doing, the possibilities for abuse will be highlighted and suggestions for their elimination will be made, all in the spirit of the Supreme Court's mandate to provide fundamental due process safeguards to this procedure.
The Effects Of Tucker On The Fruits Of Illegally Obtained Statements, Jeffery P. Reinhard
The Effects Of Tucker On The Fruits Of Illegally Obtained Statements, Jeffery P. Reinhard
Cleveland State Law Review
Although the Court has been careful to point out that illegally obtained statements are not admissible in the prosecution's case in chief, Michigan v. Tucker has done much to erode even that principle. In Tucker, the Court found admissible the testimony of a witness whose identity was learned solely on the basis of a statement obtained from the defendant in violation of the guidelines set forth in Miranda. Despite the Court's statement that it was significant that the interrogation preceded Miranda, and notwithstanding its reiteration of the principle that the defendant's statements would not have been admissible in the prosecution's …
Pretrial Discovery Of Government Informers In Federal Narcotics Cases: A Defense Tool, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 221 (1975), Richard F. Walsh
Pretrial Discovery Of Government Informers In Federal Narcotics Cases: A Defense Tool, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 221 (1975), Richard F. Walsh
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.