Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (2)
- Confessions (2)
- Custodial interrogations (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Miranda v. Arizona (2)
-
- Police (2)
- Right to counsel (2)
- Sixth Amendment (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Admission (1)
- Automatic reversal rule (1)
- Confession (1)
- Davis v. North Carolina (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Escobedo v. Illinois (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Harmless error rule (1)
- Malinski v. New York (1)
- Self-incrimination (1)
- Stroble v. California (1)
- Voluntary nature (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Criminal Procedure—Indictment—Evidence Inadmissible At Trial Is Inadmissible In Grand Jury Proceedings, Michael Nelson
Criminal Procedure—Indictment—Evidence Inadmissible At Trial Is Inadmissible In Grand Jury Proceedings, Michael Nelson
Buffalo Law Review
West v. United States, 359 F.2d 50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied mem., 87 Sup. Ct. 131 (1966).
Family Law—Application Of The Rules Against Search And Seizure To Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Alan Eber
Family Law—Application Of The Rules Against Search And Seizure To Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Alan Eber
Buffalo Law Review
Matter of Williams, 49 Misc. 2d 154, 267 N.Y.S.2d 91 (Ulster County Family Ct. 1966).
The Citizen On Trial: The New Confession Rules, Yale Kamisar
The Citizen On Trial: The New Confession Rules, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Commenting on why it has taken the United States so long to apply "the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to counsel to the proceedings in the stationhouse as well as to those in the courtroom" - as the Supreme Court did in Miranda v. Arizona - this author notes that, "To a large extent this is so because here, as elsewhere, there has been a wide gap between the principles to which we aspire and the practices we actually employ."
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My first task is to explain to some degree the nature of the problem embodied in our title. This book has been designated as "Escobedo-The Second Round." What we will be discussing is a series of cases, decided in June, 1966, the most noteworthy of which is Miranda v. Arizona [384 U.S. 436 (1966)]. In these cases, the United States Supreme Court prescribed a new set of standards governing the introduction in evidence of statements obtained from the defendant through police interrogation. Actually, to a degree these standards were not entirely new. They had been suggested, at least in part, …
Criminal Law-Confessions-Admission Of Illegally Obtained Confession In State Criminal Prosecution Is Harmless Error Not Requiring Reversal Of Conviction--People V. Jacobson, Michigan Law Review
Criminal Law-Confessions-Admission Of Illegally Obtained Confession In State Criminal Prosecution Is Harmless Error Not Requiring Reversal Of Conviction--People V. Jacobson, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Defendant voluntarily admitted that he had murdered his daughter to a social worker, two ambulance attendants, and three police officers sent to investigate the incident. He continued to declare his guilt to these officers after his arrest, on the way to the police station, and at the police station where he was interrogated without the benefit of counsel although he had not waived his right to counsel. All of the confessions-approximately ten-were admitted in evidence at the defendant's trial over his objection that the two confessions obtained during the interrogation should have been excluded since he had been denied his …