Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Hearsay (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Admission of Battered Woman Syndrome evidence; admission of Rape Trauma Syndrome evidence; Daubert standard; inadequacy of Battered Woman Syndrome methodology; scientific reliability of Battered Woman Syndrome; courts as gatekeepers of reliable scientific evidence; four factors of Daubert; social sciences; State v. Saldana; State v. Black; scientific reliability of Rape Trauma Syndrome; defense-oriented social science evidence; Black Rage; Black Rage defenses; (1)
- Admission of evidence (1)
- Balance (1)
-
- Character evidence (1)
- Collateral matters (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Crawford v. Washington (1)
- Credibility (1)
- Cross-examination (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Indicia of reliability (1)
- Michigan v. Lucas (1)
- Olden v. Kentucky (1)
- Perjury (1)
- Probative value (1)
- Rape shield statutes (1)
- Recollection (1)
- Right of confrontation (1)
- Sex crimes (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Trial testimony (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Criminal Law—When The Pillow Talks: Arkansas's Rape Shield Statute Bars Dna Evidence Excluding The Defendant As The Source Of Semen. Thacker V. State, 2015 Ark. 406, 474 S.W.3d 65., Lacon Marie Smith
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence—Sixth Amendment And The Confrontation Clause—Testimonial Trumps Reliable: The United States Supreme Court Reconsiders Its Approach To The Confrontation Clause. Crawford V. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)., Kristen Sluyter
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Gender Gap: Revealing Inequities In Admission Of Social Science Evidence In Criminal Cases, Janet C. Hoeffel
The Gender Gap: Revealing Inequities In Admission Of Social Science Evidence In Criminal Cases, Janet C. Hoeffel
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.