Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Confrontation Clause (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Admissibility of hearsay evidence (1)
- Arizona v. Evans (1)
- Arizona v. Gant (1)
-
- Automatic searches of home (1)
- Auxiliary Evidence (1)
- Battered Women's Syndrome (1)
- Battered Women's Syndrome Testimony (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Domestic violence (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) (1)
- Fifth Amendment Privilege (1)
- Gender Inequality (1)
- Good-Faith exception (1)
- Hearsay evidence (1)
- Herring v. United States (1)
- Illinois v. Krull (1)
- Law enforcement culpability (1)
- Missing Witness Doctrine (1)
- Out-of court statements (1)
- Person incident to arrest (1)
- Prosecutorial misconduct theory (1)
- Reasonable to believe standard (1)
- Rights of criminal defendant (1)
- Rule 801 (c) Hearsay (1)
- Rule 804(b)(6) (1)
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Bb Gun: A Harmless Toy Or Deadly Weapon? Practical Guidance For Objective Fact Finding In A Criminal Case, Steven N. Gosney, John Zak
The Bb Gun: A Harmless Toy Or Deadly Weapon? Practical Guidance For Objective Fact Finding In A Criminal Case, Steven N. Gosney, John Zak
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
Visualizing Dna Proof, Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos
Visualizing Dna Proof, Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
Unspringing The Witness Memory And Demeanor Trap: What Every Judge And Juror Needs To Know About Cognitive Psychology And Witness Credibility, Mark W. Bennett
Unspringing The Witness Memory And Demeanor Trap: What Every Judge And Juror Needs To Know About Cognitive Psychology And Witness Credibility, Mark W. Bennett
American University Law Review
The soul of America's civil and criminal justice systems is the ability of jurors and judges to accurately determine the facts of a dispute. This invariably implicates the credibility of witnesses. In making credibility determinations, jurors and judges necessarily decide the accuracy of witnesses' memories and the effect of the witnesses' demeanor on their credibility. Almost all jurisdictions' pattern jury instructions about witness credibility explain nothing about how a witness's memories for events and conversations work-and how startlingly fallible memories actually are. They simply instruct the jurors to consider the witness's "memory" with no additional guidance. Similarly, the same pattern …
Exploring The Prejudicial Effect Of Gang Evidence: Under What Conditions Will Jurors Ignore Reasonable Doubt, Mitchell L. Eisen, Brenna M. Dotson
Exploring The Prejudicial Effect Of Gang Evidence: Under What Conditions Will Jurors Ignore Reasonable Doubt, Mitchell L. Eisen, Brenna M. Dotson
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
On Professionalism, Civility, & Discovery, Kathryn Todryk
On Professionalism, Civility, & Discovery, Kathryn Todryk
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
On Demonstrative Evidence And Trial Graphics: What Works And What Doesn't, Ryan Flax
On Demonstrative Evidence And Trial Graphics: What Works And What Doesn't, Ryan Flax
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
The 'Rhyme Or Reason' Behind Prosecutorial Use Of Rape Lyrics As Evidence In Criminal Trials, Robery Nothdurft Jr
The 'Rhyme Or Reason' Behind Prosecutorial Use Of Rape Lyrics As Evidence In Criminal Trials, Robery Nothdurft Jr
Criminal Law Practitioner
No abstract provided.
Stepping Out Of The Vehicle: The Potential Of Arizona V. Gant To End Automatic Searches Incident To Arrest Beyond The Vehicular Context , Angad Singh
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding The Scope Of The Good-Faith Exception To The Exclusionary Rule To Include A Law Enforcement Officer's Reasonable Reliance On Well-Settled Case Law That Is Subsequently Overruled , Ross M. Oklewicz
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procuring The Right To An Unfair Trial: Federal Rule Of Evidence 804(B)(6) And The Due Process Implications Of The Rule's Failure To Require Standards Of Reliability For Admissible Evidence, Kelly Rutan
American University Law Review
This Comment argues that though the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing allows a court to forfeit both a defendant’s right to object to the admission of hearsay statements and the right of confrontation, the current state of the law requires all out-of-court statements admitted under Rule 804(b)(6) to possess some level of reliability in order to satisfy due process. Part I of this Comment discusses the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing, the courts’ treatment of this principle prior to 1997, and its codification into the Federal Rules of Evidence. Part II looks at Confrontation Clause issues unique to hearsay exceptions …
The Negative Effects Of Expert Testimony On The Battered Women's Syndrome, Pamela Posch
The Negative Effects Of Expert Testimony On The Battered Women's Syndrome, Pamela Posch
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Beating The Prisoner At Prisoner's Dilemma: The Evidentiary Value Of A Witness's Refusal To Testify , Russell Dean Covey
Beating The Prisoner At Prisoner's Dilemma: The Evidentiary Value Of A Witness's Refusal To Testify , Russell Dean Covey
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Admission Of Hearsay Evidence Where Defedant Misconduct Causes The Unavailability Of A Prosecution Witness, Paul T. Markland
The Admission Of Hearsay Evidence Where Defedant Misconduct Causes The Unavailability Of A Prosecution Witness, Paul T. Markland
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.