Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Evidence law (2)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (2)
- Federal courts (2)
- ALI Model Code of Evidence (1)
- Admissibility of evidence (1)
-
- Advisory Committee (1)
- Affidavits (1)
- Congress (1)
- Exclusionary doctrine (1)
- Extraneous prejudicial information (1)
- FRE 801(d)(1)(B) (1)
- FRE 803(24) (1)
- FRE Rule 606(b) (1)
- Hearsay rule (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Indictments (1)
- Judge Weinstein (1)
- Jury verdicts (1)
- Prior consistent statements (1)
- Privileges (1)
- Uniform Rules of Evidence (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- United States v. Iaconetti (1)
- Witness (1)
- Witness testimony (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Proposed Federal Rules Of Evidence: Of Privileges And The Division Of Rule-Making Power, Michigan Law Review
The Proposed Federal Rules Of Evidence: Of Privileges And The Division Of Rule-Making Power, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed Rules that they give those judicially promulgated procedural rules, such as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that have been implicitly approved by Congress.
Part I of the Note analyzes the constitutional division of the rule-making power by examining both the policy considerations involved and the relevant constitutional language and doctrines. That examination indicates that the power to establish such rules is shared by Congress and the Supreme Court. To determine when that power is appropriately exercised by one branch rather than the other, …
Jurors' Impeachment Of Verdicts And Indictments In Federal Court Under Rule 606(B), Christopher B. Mueller
Jurors' Impeachment Of Verdicts And Indictments In Federal Court Under Rule 606(B), Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Prior Consistent Statements, Arthur H. Travers Jr.