Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adequacy of representation (1)
- Amchem (1)
- Bias (1)
- Class Actions (1)
- Class actions (1)
-
- Demeanor (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Halo effect (1)
- Hansberry v. Lee (1)
- Hearings (1)
- Housing Court (1)
- Multidistrict Litigation and Nonclass Aggregate Litigation (1)
- Persecución Criminal (1)
- Presunción de inocencia (1)
- Prisión Preventiva (1)
- Procedural justice (1)
- Proceso Penal (1)
- Reforma Procesal Penal (1)
- Residential Landlord-Tenant Law (1)
- Trial on the papers (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Hearings, Mark Spottswood
Hearings, Mark Spottswood
Mark Spottswood
This article explores a constantly recurring procedural question: When is fact-finding improved by a live hearing, and when would it be better to rely on a written record? Unfortunately, when judges, lawyers, and rulemakers consider this issue, they are led astray by the widely shared—but false—assumption that a judge can best determine issues of credibility by viewing the demeanor of witnesses while they are testifying. In fact, a large body of scientific evidence indicates that judges are more likely to be deceived by lying or mistaken witnesses when observing their testimony in person than if the judges were to review …
Procedural Adequacy, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Procedural Adequacy, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
This short piece responds to Jay Tidmarsh’s article, Rethinking Adequacy of Representation, 87 Texas Law Review 1137 (2009). I explore Professor Tidmarsh’s proposed “do no harm” approach to adequate representation in class actions from a procedural legitimacy perspective. I begin by considering the assumption underlying his alternative, namely that in any given class action both attorneys and class representatives tend to act as self-interested homo economicus and we must therefore tailor the adequacy requirement to curb self-interest only in so far as it makes class members worse off than they would be with individual litigation. Adopting the “do no harm” …
Régimen De Prisión Preventiva En América Latina: La Pena Anticipada, La Lógica Cautelar Y La Contrarreforma / Pre-Trial Detention Regime In Latin America: The Pre-Trial Punishment, Flight Risk And The Counter Reform, Claudio Fuentes Maureira
Régimen De Prisión Preventiva En América Latina: La Pena Anticipada, La Lógica Cautelar Y La Contrarreforma / Pre-Trial Detention Regime In Latin America: The Pre-Trial Punishment, Flight Risk And The Counter Reform, Claudio Fuentes Maureira
Claudio Fuentes Maureira
One of the main reasons that justified the criminal procedure reform in Latin America was the possibility to overcome and changed different practices that were very problematic. One of these complex situations was the excessive use of pre-trial detention in the context of criminal investigations; in particular, the abuse of this institution had a dangerous outcome when it comes to the protection of the human rights of the detainees.
From the mid 90’s onwards, most of the Latin American countries started a reform of their criminal institutions and proceedings. A considerable portion of the legal framework was heavily modified in …
Evidentiary Issues In The New York City Housing Court, Gerald Lebovits
Evidentiary Issues In The New York City Housing Court, Gerald Lebovits
Hon. Gerald Lebovits