Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Broker (2)
- Liability (2)
- Negligence (2)
- Attorney-client privilege (1)
- Bank v. Randell (1)
-
- Bulk Sales Act (1)
- Carrier (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Clients (1)
- Commission (1)
- Confession (1)
- Corporate defendant (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Deed (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Dying declaration (1)
- Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co. (1)
- Exception (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Gaither v. Charlotte Motor Car Co. (1)
- Hinson v. State (1)
- Hydroplane (1)
- Innkeeper (1)
- Insanity (1)
- Interstate rate (1)
- Jones v. Bland (1)
- Jury (1)
- Jutras v. Boisvert (1)
- Kausch v. Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Ry. Co. (1)
- Lawyers (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Evidence--Privileged Communications--The Attorney-Client Privilege In The Corporate Setting: A Suggested Approach, Michigan Law Review
Evidence--Privileged Communications--The Attorney-Client Privilege In The Corporate Setting: A Suggested Approach, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note will first review the development of the personal attorney-client privilege and the extent to which the term "client" has been expanded for use with that privilege. Then, the development of the corporate attorney-client privilege will be examined with an eye toward isolating the tests that the courts have used to define the extent of the term "client." Finally, with the results of these examinations in mind, an approach will be suggested that, if adopted by the courts, could effectively eliminate the confusion that presently exists with regard to the scope of the attorney-client privilege in the corporate setting.
Federal Civil Procedure-Discovery-Availability Of Attorney-Client Privilege To Corporations, Stephen M. Wittenberg
Federal Civil Procedure-Discovery-Availability Of Attorney-Client Privilege To Corporations, Stephen M. Wittenberg
Michigan Law Review
During the pre-trial stage of a civil antitrust suit, plaintiff sought inspection of certain documents in the files of the corporate defendants' outside counsel. The defendant contended that these documents were protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege. Upon motion for inspection, held, granted. The attorney-client privilege is not available to any of the corporate parties in this action. Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass'n, 207 F. Supp. 771, aff'd on rehearing, 209 F. Supp. 321 (N.D. Ill. 1962).
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Admiralty - Workmen's Compensation - Is a Hydroplane a Vessel? - Claimant was employed in the care and management of a hydroplane which was moored in navigable waters. The hydroplane began to drag anchor and drift toward the beach, where it was in danger of being wrecked. Claimant waded into the water and was struck by the propeller. Held, claimant is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, since a hydroplane while on navigable waters is a vessel, and therefore the jurisdiction of the admiralty excludes that of the State Industrial Commission. Reinhardt v. Newport Flying Service Corp. …