Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bond (1)
- Book of account (1)
- Broker (1)
- Carmack Amendment (1)
- Carrier (1)
-
- Competition (1)
- Cummins Amendment (1)
- Dominguez v. State (1)
- Dying declaration (1)
- Extradition (1)
- Gaither v. Charlotte Motor Car Co. (1)
- Hinson v. State (1)
- Hot trail (1)
- Hydroplane (1)
- Innkeeper (1)
- Insanity (1)
- Internal Revenue Law of 1921 (1)
- Interstate rate (1)
- Jones v. Bland (1)
- Jury (1)
- Jutras v. Boisvert (1)
- Kansas declaratory judgment (1)
- Kausch v. Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Ry. Co. (1)
- La Follette Amendment (1)
- Liability (1)
- Maritime law (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Oregon Workmen's Compensation Act (1)
- Parlement Belge (1)
- Partnership (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Note And Comment, Edwin C. Goddard, George Seletto, Edson R. Sunderland, Victor H. Lane, Burke Shartel, George E. Longstaff
Note And Comment, Edwin C. Goddard, George Seletto, Edson R. Sunderland, Victor H. Lane, Burke Shartel, George E. Longstaff
Michigan Law Review
Carriers - Second Cummins Amendment - It was seven years after the Carmack Amendment of the Hepburn Act of i9o6 before the Supreme Court began that series of decisions, extending from Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491 (1913), to George N. Pierce Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co., 236 U. S. 278 (1915), which directly resulted in the First Cummins Amendment of March, 1915. One has only to read those cases, reviewed in 13 Micn. L. REv. 59o, and other notes referred to in 17 MICH. L. Rzv. 183, to see that the language of the Cummins …
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Admiralty - Workmen's Compensation - Is a Hydroplane a Vessel? - Claimant was employed in the care and management of a hydroplane which was moored in navigable waters. The hydroplane began to drag anchor and drift toward the beach, where it was in danger of being wrecked. Claimant waded into the water and was struck by the propeller. Held, claimant is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, since a hydroplane while on navigable waters is a vessel, and therefore the jurisdiction of the admiralty excludes that of the State Industrial Commission. Reinhardt v. Newport Flying Service Corp. …
Note And Comment, George E. Longstaff, George L. Clark, Edwin D. Dickinson
Note And Comment, George E. Longstaff, George L. Clark, Edwin D. Dickinson
Michigan Law Review
Constitutionality of the LA Follette Amendment to the Internal Revenue Law of 1921 - The United States Senate on November 5, 1921, inserted in the Revenue Act, then before the Senate, a provision that taxpayers in their income tax returns must specify what state and municipal bonds they hold, or else be subject to a penalty of five per cent. That provision was dropped out in conference, but it will come up again, and it is well to look at its constitutionality under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution prohibiting unreasonable searches.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.