Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Estates and Trusts Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Property Law and Real Estate

University of Michigan Law School

Advancement

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Estates and Trusts

Descent And Distribution - Effect Of Advancements, Debts And Releases When Expectant Distributee Predeceases Intestate, Eric E. Bergsten May 1956

Descent And Distribution - Effect Of Advancements, Debts And Releases When Expectant Distributee Predeceases Intestate, Eric E. Bergsten

Michigan Law Review

The law of advancements is part of the law of intestate succession. But the right of retainer, which allows an offset against a distributee's share of the estate for a debt owed by the distributee to the decedent, is merely a method of debt collection and historically has not been considered as a part of the law of inheritance. For this and other reasons, the law applicable to advancements in this situation is better treated separately from that concerning debts of predeceased expectant heirs. There are also sufficient differences between the treatment given a release and that of either an …


Advancements: Iii, Harold I. Elbert Feb 1954

Advancements: Iii, Harold I. Elbert

Michigan Law Review

Many states have statutes which provide that support, maintenance and education of a child will not be considered an advancement unless the parent intended it as such. The Kentucky statute is typical and it reads in part as follows: " . . . the maintaining or educating or the giving of money, to a child or grandchild without any view to a portion or settlement in life, shall not be deemed an advancement." Most states do not have statutes of that type but by judicial decision reach a result that is in accord with the statutory provision just quoted.


Advancements: Ii, Harold I. Elbert Dec 1953

Advancements: Ii, Harold I. Elbert

Michigan Law Review

A voluntary inter vivos transfer by a parent to a child is not an advancement so long as the transferor lives. The purpose of the doctrine is to equalize an intestate' s property among his children. It is auxiliary to the distribution of his estate that the question of advancement is raised. The death of the transferor is not enough to give rise to the doctrine. The person seeking to charge the intestate's heirs with an advancement must prove several additional facts. The legislation of each state determines what must be proved in order to charge the transferee with an …