Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Air standards (1)
- Article I section 7 (1)
- Burden (1)
- Clean Air Act (1)
- Clear Air Act Amendments (1)
-
- Court of Appeals (1)
- DEC (1)
- EPA (1)
- Endangered Species Act (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Environmentalist (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- Gazza (1)
- Gazza v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (1)
- Goldblatt v. hempstead (1)
- Governmental Takings (1)
- Lucas v. south carolina coastal council (1)
- Midwest (1)
- Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1)
- Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (1)
- National Forest Management Act of 1976 (1)
- New york state constitution (1)
- New york state department of environmental conservation (1)
- Northeast (1)
- Ozone Transportation Regulation (1)
- Penn central transp. co. v. city of new york (1)
- Permit (1)
- Pollution (1)
- Prosecutorial discretion (1)
- Ruckelhaus v. monsanto (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Environmental Law
Prohibiting Conduct, Not Consequences: The Limited Reach Of The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Benjamin Means
Prohibiting Conduct, Not Consequences: The Limited Reach Of The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Benjamin Means
Michigan Law Review
Dissatisfied with the protection afforded wildlife by more recent environmental laws, some environmentalists seek to reinterpret one of the oldest federal environmental laws, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Long understood simply to regulate hunting, the MBTA makes it illegal to "take" or "kill" migratory birds without a permit. The MBTA imposes strict liability for a violation. A heady combination of strict liability, criminal penalty provisions, and vague language, the MBTA appeals to those seeking to control land use activity. Some environmentalists advocate an interpretation of the MBTA that, contrary to legislative intent and 80 years of enforcement practice, would …
Governmental Takings, Court Of Appeals: Gazza V. New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ozone Transport And The Clean Air Act: The Answers Are Blowin' In The Wind, Shari R. Desalvo
Ozone Transport And The Clean Air Act: The Answers Are Blowin' In The Wind, Shari R. Desalvo
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note addresses the major provisions of the Clean Air Act that deal with the transport of ozone from one state to another. After an overview of the Act and specific sections dealing with ozone transport, the Note discusses the Environmental Protection Agency's (the "EPA") inconsistent interpretation and application of the Act, as exposed through the limited case law addressing this issue to date. Next, using the illustrative cases of Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Note discusses how Northeastern states are suffering economically and physically due to Midwestern pollution. This Note concludes that it is time for the EPA to stop …