Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- 35 U.S.C. ยง 271(e) (1)
- A trademark justification for design patent rights (1)
- Apple v. samsung (1)
- Ariad pharmaceuticals v. eli lilly & Co. (1)
- Balboa mfg (1)
-
- Becton Dickinson & Co. (1)
- Bilski v. Kappos (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Byars (1)
- CAFC (1)
- CCPA (1)
- Champagne chair (1)
- Christianson v. Colt Indus. (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright Protection (1)
- Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (1)
- D. Nimmer (1)
- Daniel brean (1)
- Dennis crouch (1)
- Design patent (1)
- Design patent system for the twenty-first century (1)
- Designs (1)
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1)
- Diamond v. diehr (1)
- EBay v. Mercexchange (1)
- Egyptian goddess (1)
- Eldred v. Ashcroft (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
Explaining The Supreme Court's Interest In Patent Law, Timothy R. Holbrook
Explaining The Supreme Court's Interest In Patent Law, Timothy R. Holbrook
IP Theory
No abstract provided.
Not (Necessarily) Narrower: Rethinking The Relative Scope Of Copyright Protection For Designs, Sarah Burstein
Not (Necessarily) Narrower: Rethinking The Relative Scope Of Copyright Protection For Designs, Sarah Burstein
IP Theory
No abstract provided.