Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
Beyond Microsoft: Intellectual Property, Peer Production And The Law’S Concern With Market Dominance., Daryl Lim
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Cross-Ownershipís Last Stand? The Federal Communication Commissionís Proposal Concerning The Repeal Of The Newspaper/Broadcast Cross- Ownership Rule , Judith C. Aarons
Cross-Ownershipís Last Stand? The Federal Communication Commissionís Proposal Concerning The Repeal Of The Newspaper/Broadcast Cross- Ownership Rule , Judith C. Aarons
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Sharing The Wealth: Don’T Call Us. We’Ll Call You: Why Revenue Sharing Is A Permissive Subject And Therefore The Labor Exemption Does Not Apply., Jessica Cohen
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Start-Up Sports Leagues: Why These Leagues Are Entitled To Use The Ruinous Competition Defense To Justify Anticompetitive Restraints, Marc P. Schwartz*
Start-Up Sports Leagues: Why These Leagues Are Entitled To Use The Ruinous Competition Defense To Justify Anticompetitive Restraints, Marc P. Schwartz*
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Labor Pains: Why Contraction Is Not The Solution To Major League Baseball’S Competitive Balance Problems, Bryan Day
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The European Database Directive: Regional Stepping Stone To An International Model?, G. M. Hunsucker
The European Database Directive: Regional Stepping Stone To An International Model?, G. M. Hunsucker
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
"Conditional" Functionality: The New Standard For Evaluating "Aesthetic" Functionality Established By The Second Circuit In Wallace International Silversmiths, Inc. V. Godsinger Silver Art Co., Mark I. Peroff, Nancy J. Deckinger
"Conditional" Functionality: The New Standard For Evaluating "Aesthetic" Functionality Established By The Second Circuit In Wallace International Silversmiths, Inc. V. Godsinger Silver Art Co., Mark I. Peroff, Nancy J. Deckinger
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.