Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Art (1)
- Art backed loans (1)
- Banks (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Due diligence (1)
-
- First Amendment (1)
- Free exercise (1)
- Loans (1)
- RICO (1)
- Religion (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Retirement Security (1)
- Science and Technology (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Secured loans (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Sincerity (1)
- Social Welfare (1)
- Sports (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Strength of belief (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift (1)
- Taxation-Federal Income (1)
- Taxation-State and Local (1)
- Taxation-Transnational (1)
- Theistic (1)
- Torts (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
The Art Of A Loan: “When The Loan Sharks Meet Damien Hirst’S ‘$12-Million Stuffed Shark’”, Valerie Medelyan
The Art Of A Loan: “When The Loan Sharks Meet Damien Hirst’S ‘$12-Million Stuffed Shark’”, Valerie Medelyan
Pace Law Review
Part I of this Article introduces the reader to the typical types of loans that banks make, includes an in-depth description of a secured loan, and finishes with a discussion of the due diligence requirements of banks. Part II identifies the unique complexities posed by art when it is used as collateral, comparing and contrasting the banks’ process when approving a loan secured by commonly-used assets versus a loan secured by art. Part III discusses the banks’ growing willingness to approve art-backed loans, and identifies the safeguards built into such deals. Part IV introduces the sub-prime lenders of the art …
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Mark Strasser
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion. Non-religious practices do not receive those same protections, which makes the ability to distinguish between religious and non-religious practices important. Regrettably, members of the Court have been unable to agree about how to distinguish the religious from the non-religious—sometimes, the implicit criteria focus on the sincerity of the beliefs, sometimes the strength of the beliefs or the role that they play in an individual’s life, and sometimes the kind of beliefs. In short, the Court has virtually guaranteed an incoherent jurisprudence by sending contradictory signals with …