Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 35 U.S.C. § 271(e) (1)
- Ariad pharmaceuticals v. eli lilly & Co. (1)
- Artistic Freedom (1)
- Artistic Merit (1)
- Becton Dickinson & Co. (1)
-
- Bilski v. Kappos (1)
- CAFC (1)
- CCPA (1)
- Christianson v. Colt Indus. (1)
- Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (1)
- Decency and Respect (1)
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1)
- Diamond v. diehr (1)
- EBay v. Mercexchange (1)
- Eldred v. Ashcroft (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
- Festo Corp. (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Formalism at the Federal Circuit (1)
- Global-Tech Appliances (1)
- Gunn v. Minton (1)
- Hilton Davis Chem (1)
- Holmes Grp (1)
- Hyatt v. Kappos (1)
- Ill. Tool Works Inc. (1)
- J.E.M. Agricultural Supply (1)
- John F. Duffy (1)
- John M. Golden (1)
- KSR (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
Explaining The Supreme Court's Interest In Patent Law, Timothy R. Holbrook
Explaining The Supreme Court's Interest In Patent Law, Timothy R. Holbrook
IP Theory
No abstract provided.
Who Needs Tickets? Examining Problems In The Growing Online Ticket Resale Industry, Clark P. Kirkman
Who Needs Tickets? Examining Problems In The Growing Online Ticket Resale Industry, Clark P. Kirkman
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Internet has dramatically changed the methods by which people purchase tickets to events. In the past decade, the secondary ticket market has grown exponentially, and today the online ticket resale industry is valued at approximately $4 billion. Although there are consumer benefits to this industry growth, some of the industry practices have precipitated a consumer backlash. This was typified in 2007 when many parents, hoping to purchase tickets to the Hannah Montana "Best of Both Worlds Tour," watched as tickets sold out online in only a few minutes or less. Coupled with this episode was the Ticketmaster v. RMG …
Performing Art: National Endowment For The Arts V. Finley, Randall P. Bezanson
Performing Art: National Endowment For The Arts V. Finley, Randall P. Bezanson
Federal Communications Law Journal
In this modified version of a chapter in his forthcoming book, ART AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH (Univ. of Illinois Press, 2008-09), Professor Bezanson begins to probe the nature of art and its relation to the first amendment free speech guarantee. The essay uses the Finley v. NEA case, and specifically its discussion of Finley's performance art, to critique the Supreme Court's very approach to the Finley case, and to view the issues from the perspective of art, artistic freedom, and the Supreme Court's role in fashioning constitutional protection for art as art, and not simply as cognitive speech.