Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Adjudication (1)
- Algorithms (1)
- Big Data (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Decisionmaking (1)
-
- Fair use defense (1)
- Follow-on works (1)
- Football (1)
- Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc. (1)
- Governance (1)
- Human-machine hybrids (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Intellectual property law & policy (1)
- Marketability (1)
- Polycentricity (1)
- Referees (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Robots (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Soccer (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Systems (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
Fair Play: Notes On The Algorithmic Soccer Referee, Michael J. Madison
Fair Play: Notes On The Algorithmic Soccer Referee, Michael J. Madison
Articles
The soccer referee stands in for a judge. Soccer’s Video Assistant Referee (“VAR”) system stands in for algorithms that augment human deciders. Fair play stands in for justice. They are combined and set in a polycentric system of governance, with implications for designing, administering, and assessing human-machine combinations.
Propertizing Fair Use, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky
Propertizing Fair Use, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky
All Faculty Scholarship
In its current form, fair use doctrine provides a personal defense that applies narrowly to the specific use by the specific user. The landmark case of Google v. Oracle, currently pending before the Supreme Court, illustrates why this is problematic. Even if the Court were to rule that Google’s use of Oracle’s Java API’s was fair, the ruling would not protect the numerous parties that developed Java applications for the Android operating system; it would only shelter Google and Google’s particular use. This is not an isolated problem; the per use/per user rule cuts across fair uses of copyrighted …