Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (2)
- Adjudication (1)
- American legal theory (1)
- Anti-professionalism (1)
- Cable TV (1)
-
- Censorship (1)
- College Athletes (1)
- College sports (1)
- Community morality (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Argument (1)
- Constitutional adjudication (1)
- Conventional morality (1)
- Drug use testing (1)
- Drug-Testing (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Freedom of Speech (1)
- Government Regulation (1)
- I.U. Office of Counseling and Psychological Services (1)
- Imperativism (1)
- Imperativist (1)
- Indecency (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- John Barth (1)
- Law and literature (1)
- Law-as-literature movement (1)
- Legal criticism (1)
- Legal ethics (1)
- Legal formalists (1)
- Legal realists (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
The Right To Speak, The Right To Hear, And The Right Not To Hear: The Technological Resolution To The Cable/Pornography Debate, Michael I. Meyerson
The Right To Speak, The Right To Hear, And The Right Not To Hear: The Technological Resolution To The Cable/Pornography Debate, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
The advent of cable television presented a new opportunity to consider the competing interests on each side of the free speech/pornography debate. This Article attempts to construct an analysis that will be consistent with Supreme Court teaching on how government, under the first amendment, may constitutionally regulate legal obscenity, particularly in the name of protecting those who wish to avoid exposure to such material.
The Article shows how, unlike earlier battles over technology and pornography, cable television presented the novel opportunity to have a technological rather than a censorial solution to this difficult problem.
Playing The Drug-Testing Game: College Athletes, Regulatory Institutions, And The Structures Of Constitutional Argument, John A. Scanlan
Playing The Drug-Testing Game: College Athletes, Regulatory Institutions, And The Structures Of Constitutional Argument, John A. Scanlan
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Adjudication Is Not Interpretation: Some Reservations About The Law-As-Literature Movement, Robin West
Adjudication Is Not Interpretation: Some Reservations About The Law-As-Literature Movement, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Among other achievements, the modern law-as-literature movement has prompted increasing numbers of legal scholars to embrace the claim that adjudication is interpretation, and more specifically, that constitutional adjudication is interpretation of the Constitution. That adjudication is interpretation -- that an adjudicative act is an interpretive act -- more than any other central commitment, unifies the otherwise diverse strands of the legal and constitutional theory of the late twentieth century.
In this article, I will argue in this article against both modern forms of interpretivism. The analogue of law to literature, on which much of modern interpretivism is based, although fruitful, …