Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free exercise (1)
- RICO (1)
- Religion (1)
-
- Remedies (1)
- Retirement Security (1)
- Science and Technology (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Sincerity (1)
- Social Welfare (1)
- Sports (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Strength of belief (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift (1)
- Taxation-Federal Income (1)
- Taxation-State and Local (1)
- Taxation-Transnational (1)
- Theistic (1)
- Torts (1)
- Trade Regulation (1)
- Transportation Law (1)
- Water Law (1)
- Women (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
Self-Replicating Technologies And The Challenge For The Patent And Antitrust Laws, 32 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 131 (2013), Daryl Lim
Daryl Lim
Few patented inventions challenge the traditional boundaries of the patent and antitrust laws like those that are capable of multiplying as they are used. These self-replicating technologies are embedded in our food, fortify our vaccines, and form the computer code upon which the information age is based. These inventions create an inherent conflict between patentees and their customers. The conflict arises because every customer could become competitors as the product replicates, potentially making every first sale the patentee's last. They also challenge how we think about fundamental issues of ownership as well as innovation and market competition, and make it …
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Mark Strasser
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion. Non-religious practices do not receive those same protections, which makes the ability to distinguish between religious and non-religious practices important. Regrettably, members of the Court have been unable to agree about how to distinguish the religious from the non-religious—sometimes, the implicit criteria focus on the sincerity of the beliefs, sometimes the strength of the beliefs or the role that they play in an individual’s life, and sometimes the kind of beliefs. In short, the Court has virtually guaranteed an incoherent jurisprudence by sending contradictory signals with …