Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Politics (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Cultural Heritage Law (1)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Keyword
-
- Elections (2)
- 2016 Presidential Election (1)
- American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees (1)
- Austen L. Parrish (1)
- Austen Parrish (1)
-
- Aviva Orenstein (1)
- Chiafalo Electors (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Dean Parrish (1)
- Dean's Desk (1)
- Deans (1)
- Deborah Widiss (1)
- Electoral Politics (1)
- Equitable Remedies Doctrine (1)
- FTO (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Foreign Terrorist Organizations (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Indiana University Maurer School of Law (1)
- Janus v. AFSCME (1)
- Jeannine Bell (1)
- Jennifer Bryan Morgan (1)
- Jessica Eaglin (1)
- Justiciability (1)
- Labor Unions (1)
- Laissez-Faire (1)
- Law and the pandemic (1)
- Leandra Lederman (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
Dean's Desk: Iu Maurer Research Focusing On Most Topical Issues Of 2020, Austen L. Parrish
Dean's Desk: Iu Maurer Research Focusing On Most Topical Issues Of 2020, Austen L. Parrish
Austen Parrish (2014-2022)
The three major stories of 2020 — the COVID-19 pandemic, the heightened awareness of racial injustice and the election — have made this year one that we will remember. While we couldn’t have envisioned all that would happen at the beginning of the year, our faculty are producing useful and thought-provoking scholarship on all these topics.
I often use my Dean’s Desk columns to celebrate student and alumni achievement, to describe new and innovative programs in our curriculum, or to share how the law school supports and collaborates with community organizations and the courts to provide pro bono legal services …
Gerrymandering & Justiciability: The Political Question Doctrine After Rucho V. Common Cause, G. Michael Parsons
Gerrymandering & Justiciability: The Political Question Doctrine After Rucho V. Common Cause, G. Michael Parsons
Indiana Law Journal
This Article deconstructs Rucho’s articulation and application of the political question doctrine and makes two contributions. First, the Article disentangles the political question doctrine from neighboring justiciability doctrines. The result is a set of substantive principles that should guide federal courts as they exercise a range of routine judicial functions—remedial, adjudicative, and interpretive. Rather than unrealistically attempting to draw crisp jurisdictional boundaries between exercises of “political” and “judicial” power, the political question doctrine should seek to moderate their inevitable (and frequent) clash. Standing doctrine should continue to guide courts in determining whether they have authority over a case involving a …
The Changing Face Of Terrorism And The Designation Of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, Patrick J. Keenan
The Changing Face Of Terrorism And The Designation Of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, Patrick J. Keenan
Indiana Law Journal
In this Article, I take up one slice of what should be a broad re-examination of
U.S. law and policy. I argue that the new attacks have been undertaken by entities
that can and should be designated as foreign terrorist organizations. Doing this would
permit prosecutors to target those who support these entities with tools that are not
currently available. This Article is both a doctrinal argument that directly addresses
the many legal hurdles that make designating groups, such as foreign hackers and
troll farms, terrorist organizations a complicated endeavor, and a policy argument
about how U.S. law and policy …
Speech Inequality After Janus V. Afscme, Charlotte Garden
Speech Inequality After Janus V. Afscme, Charlotte Garden
Indiana Law Journal
This Article explores the growing divide between the Roberts Court’s treatment of the free speech rights of wealthy individuals and corporations in campaign finance cases as compared to its treatment of the rights of public-sector labor unions and their members. First, it highlights some internal contradictions in the Janus Court’s analysis. Then, it discusses the growing—yet mostly ignored—divergence in the Court’s treatment of corporate and labor speakers with respect to the use of market influence to achieve political influence.
The Article has two Parts. In Part I, I explain how the Court reached its decision in Janus before critiquing the …
Reevaluating Politicized Identity & Notions Of An American Political Community In The Legal & Political Process, Marvin L. Astrada Jd, Phd
Reevaluating Politicized Identity & Notions Of An American Political Community In The Legal & Political Process, Marvin L. Astrada Jd, Phd
Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality
No abstract provided.
Chiafalo: Constitutionalizing Historical Gloss In Law And Democratic Politics, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel Charles
Chiafalo: Constitutionalizing Historical Gloss In Law And Democratic Politics, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel Charles
Articles by Maurer Faculty
We make one central point in this Article. Justice Kagan’s opinion in Chiafalo uses historical gloss to entrench a particular and modern view of political participation—which is best reflected by American political practices— by rejecting an alternative and anachronistic view—which is best reflected by the text and structure of the Constitution. Part I argues that Chiafalo is not a textualist opinion because Article II, Section 1 does not support the majority’s conclusion that states have the power to limit elector discretion. The majority’s reasoning to the contrary is not persuasive, even on its own terms. Part II argues that Chiafalo …