Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Amateur; amateurism; sports; football; college football; athelete; college athelete; student athelete; NCAA; Mark Emmert; right to publicity; First Amendment; Olympics; Olympic Model; Olympic amateur; labor law; employment law; name and likeness; Pay to Play Act; college; university; antitrust law; Ninth Circuit; FanDuel; fantasy sports; minor league; Fair Labor Standards Act; FLSA; law; policy (1)
- Image and Likeness; NIL; NCAA; College football; student-athlete; COVID-19; Nationa Collegiate Athletic Association; Fair Pay to Play Act; California Statute SB206; Gavin Newsom; Carnegie Foundtion; college football; intercollegiate sport; amateurism; scholarship; Sherman Antitrust Act; monopoly; Standard Oil v. U.S.; NCAA v. Board of Regents; market; videogames; archival footage; licenses; group licenses; Commerce Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; NCAA v. Miller; contract; legislation; implementation; independent third party; clearinghouse; negotiate; appeal; title IX; (1)
- O'Bannon v. NCAA; Sherman Anti-Trust Act; Name (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Education Law
The Modern Pay For Play Model: Laws That Protect Student-Athletes' Fundamental Right To Commercialze Their Names, Images, And Likeness, Paul A. Schwabe Jr.
The Modern Pay For Play Model: Laws That Protect Student-Athletes' Fundamental Right To Commercialze Their Names, Images, And Likeness, Paul A. Schwabe Jr.
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
In O’Bannon v. NCAA, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered a permanent injunction against the National Collegiate Athletic Association enjoining the collegiate sports governing body from enforcing limits on student-athlete compensation derived from the use of their name, images, and likenesses rights. The court concluded that NCAA rules unreasonably restrained trade in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, however, neither the court nor the NCAA laid out a framework for lawfully implementing these new economic rights to student-athletes. Since that ruling, only one state’s legislature, California, has attempted to pass legislation to prevent the …
Preserving Fabled Amateurism: The Benefits Of The Ncaa’S Adoption Of The Olympic Amateurism Model, John Kealey
Preserving Fabled Amateurism: The Benefits Of The Ncaa’S Adoption Of The Olympic Amateurism Model, John Kealey
Journal of Law and Policy
After a century of denying student-athletes from receiving compensation outside the cost of attendance for their athletic contributions to their respective universities, the NCAA finally announced it would change its amateurism rule. The change came in response to multiple class action lawsuits and, more recently, legislation from many states, namely California and New York, which would have mandated that universities do not interfere with student-athletes desire to commercially exploit their own names, image, and likenesses. However, these statutes are potentially flawed in that each could exacerbate or perpetuate the anti-trust and first amendment issues inherent to the current amateurism rule. …