Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (2)
- 131 S.Ct. 1350 (1)
- 360 U.S. 264 (1)
- 373 U.S. 83 (1)
- 476 U.S. 79 (1)
-
- 489 U.S. 378 (1)
- 5th (1)
- ABA Survey on Lawyer Disciplinary Systems (SOLD) (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Aerial surveillance (1)
- Alford v. State (1)
- Alito (1)
- American Bar Association (1)
- And a Modest Proposal (1)
- Attorney General (1)
- Attorney Regulation Counsel (1)
- Basic identification information (1)
- Batson errors (1)
- Batson v. Kentucky (1)
- Bill of rights (1)
- Booking (1)
- Booking paperwork (1)
- Brady obligations (1)
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- Brady violations (1)
- Canton v. Harris (1)
- Ciraolo (1)
- Citizens Protection Act of 1998 (1)
- Clarification (1)
- Connick v. Thompson (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
State V. Brossart: Adapting The Fourth Amendment For A Future With Drones, Thomas Bryan
State V. Brossart: Adapting The Fourth Amendment For A Future With Drones, Thomas Bryan
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Prosecutor Prince: Misconduct, Accountability, And A Modest Proposal, H. Mitchell Caldwell
The Prosecutor Prince: Misconduct, Accountability, And A Modest Proposal, H. Mitchell Caldwell
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Misconstruing Graham & Miller, Cara H. Drinan
Misconstruing Graham & Miller, Cara H. Drinan
Scholarly Articles
In the last three years the Supreme Court has decreed a sea change in its juvenile Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. In particular, in its Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama rulings, the Court struck down a majority of the states’ juvenile sentencing laws, outlawing life without parole for juveniles who commit non-homicide offenses and mandating individualized sentencing for those children who commit even the most serious crimes. An examination of state laws and sentencing practices, however, suggests that the Graham and Miller rulings have fallen on deaf ears. After briefly describing what these two decisions required of the states, in …
In Need Of Clarification: A Call To Define The Scope Of The Routine Booking Exception By Adopting The Legitimate Administrative Function Test, Elizabeth Parrish
In Need Of Clarification: A Call To Define The Scope Of The Routine Booking Exception By Adopting The Legitimate Administrative Function Test, Elizabeth Parrish
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.