Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Book review (1)
- CBA Court-Appointed Counsel Task Force (1)
- Chief Justice Directives (1)
-
- Colorado (1)
- Colorado Constitution (1)
- Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal defense attorneys (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Grand juries (1)
- Indigent persons (1)
- James Stewart (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Plea bargaining (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Prosecutorial discretion (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Stern v. Grand County Court (1)
- The Prosecutors (1)
- White collar crime (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Case & Statute Comments, The New Massachusetts Drug Asset Forfeiture Law: A Dialogue, R. Michael Cassidy
Case & Statute Comments, The New Massachusetts Drug Asset Forfeiture Law: A Dialogue, R. Michael Cassidy
R. Michael Cassidy
No abstract provided.
The Adversarial System At Risk, Bennett L. Gershman
The Adversarial System At Risk, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The most ominous recent development affecting the balance of forces in the adversary system is the unprecedented attack by prosecutors on criminal defense lawyers themselves. Grand jury subpoenas to attorneys, law office searches, disqualification motions, fee forfeiture proceedings, and, most recently, IRS attempts to enforce currency-reporting regulations do not seem to be isolated occurrences or mere happenstance. Rather, perhaps inspired by Shakespeare's injunction in Henry VI to "kill all the lawyers," some prosecutors appear to have concluded that the most effective way to prevail in the battle against crime is to cripple the defense lawyers, particularly those who represent defendants …
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court-Appointed Attorneys: Old Problems And New Solutions, H. Patrick Furman
Court-Appointed Attorneys: Old Problems And New Solutions, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review, William T. Pizzi
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
This article is an introduction to the UMKC Law Review symposium issue dedicated to exploring the topic of capital punishment. UMKC Professor of Law Sean O’Brien shares how the growing importance of capital litigation makes this a timely and appropriate subject for consideration and shares how the university and the Law Review's attention to the death penalty debate contributes to more than just academic discussion.
Court Finds Needle Possession Justified To Limit Spread Of Aids, Sharon Beckman
Court Finds Needle Possession Justified To Limit Spread Of Aids, Sharon Beckman
Sharon Beckman
No abstract provided.