Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ADR (1)
- Ciminal law (1)
- Communication technologies (1)
- Corporate law (1)
- Criminal justice debt (1)
-
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal rehabilitation (1)
- DPAs (1)
- Deferred prosecution (1)
- Electronic messaging (1)
- Fees (1)
- Imprisonment (1)
- In-person visitation (1)
- Incarceration (1)
- Jail (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Prison (1)
- Prison mail (1)
- Prisoner reentry (1)
- Privatization (1)
- Recidivism (1)
- Reintegration (1)
- Rule-of-law (1)
- Separation-of-power (1)
- Social justice (1)
- Telephone fees (1)
- Video visitation (1)
- Visitation (1)
- White collar crime (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Sweetheart Deals, Deferred Prosecution, And Making A Mockery Of The Criminal Justice System: U.S. Corporate Dpas Rejected On Many Fronts, Peter Reilly
Faculty Scholarship
Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) are contracts negotiated between the federal government and defendants to address allegations of corporate misconduct without going to trial. The agreements are hailed as a model of speedy and efficient law enforcement, but also derided as making a “mockery” of America’s criminal justice system stemming from lenient deals being offered to some defendants. This Article questions why corporate DPAs are not given meaningful judicial review when such protection is required for other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) tools, including plea bargains, settlement agreements, and consent decrees. The Article also analyzes several cases in which federal district …
Connecting The Disconnected: Communication Technologies For The Incarcerated, Neil Sobol
Connecting The Disconnected: Communication Technologies For The Incarcerated, Neil Sobol
Faculty Scholarship
Incarceration is a family problem—more than 2.7 million children in the United States have a parent in jail or prison. It adversely impacts family relationships, financial stability, and the mental health and well-being of family members. Empirical research shows that communications between inmates and their families improve family stability and successful reintegration while also reducing the inmate’s incidence of behavioral issues and recidivism rates. However, systemic barriers significantly impact the ability of inmates and their families to communicate. Both traditional and newly developed technological communication tools have inherent advantages and disadvantages. In addition, private contracting of communication services too often …