Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Selected Works (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Admissibility (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
-
- Due Process (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Search and Seizure (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Arrest (1)
- Attorney-client communication (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Constitution Revision Committee (1)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure (1)
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure; (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Corrections (1)
- Covert entry (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Due process (1)
- Effective counsel (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Federal habeas corpus (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Furman v. Georgia (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 21 of 21
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Due Process And Parole Revocation, Michigan Law Review
Due Process And Parole Revocation, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In Morrissey, the Court set the level of due process needed in parole revocations. Specifically, it held that the parolee facing •revocation has a right (a) to receive written notice of the claimed parole violations; (b) to hear the evidence against him; (c) to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing the confrontation); (e) to have a neutral and detached hearing body, members of which need not be judicial officers or lawyers; and (f) to be given …
Michigan V. Defillippo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Michigan V. Defillippo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Dunaway V. New York, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Dunaway V. New York, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Duren V. Missouri, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Smith V. Maryland, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Jackson V. Virginia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Jackson V. Virginia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
An Equitable Treatment Of Unauthorized Prosecutorial Promises Of Immunity, Sherry Perkins Bartley
An Equitable Treatment Of Unauthorized Prosecutorial Promises Of Immunity, Sherry Perkins Bartley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure-Double Jeopardy-Government's Right To Appeal A Midtrial Dismissal- United States V. Scott
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Step Toward Uniformity: Review Of Life Sentences In Capital Cases, Ron Bergwerk
A Step Toward Uniformity: Review Of Life Sentences In Capital Cases, Ron Bergwerk
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bordenkircher V. Hayes: Prosecutorial Discretion During Plea Bargaining, Alan M. Wishnoff
Bordenkircher V. Hayes: Prosecutorial Discretion During Plea Bargaining, Alan M. Wishnoff
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Daniel P. Smith, R. Michael Moore
Recent Cases, Daniel P. Smith, R. Michael Moore
Vanderbilt Law Review
Courts Split on the Necessity of Separate Authorization for a Covert Entry Under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
Daniel Paul Smith
Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968,' which regulates the use of electronic surveillance, was designed to protect "the privacy of wire and oral communications,"and to delineate "on a uniform basis the circumstances and conditions under which the interception of wire and oral communications may be authorized."' In general, communications may be intercepted only by law enforcement officers, who are engaged in the investigation of …
Weatherford V. Bursey, George Robert Dittrich
Weatherford V. Bursey, George Robert Dittrich
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preventive Detention And Equal Protection Of The Law In Texas., Mark Stevens
Preventive Detention And Equal Protection Of The Law In Texas., Mark Stevens
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Criminal Procedure - Due Process Is Not Violated When Prosecutor Carries Out Threat To Bring Increased Charges After Defendant Refuses To Plead Guilty During Plea Bargaining Session, Catherine N. Jasons
Criminal Procedure - Due Process Is Not Violated When Prosecutor Carries Out Threat To Bring Increased Charges After Defendant Refuses To Plead Guilty During Plea Bargaining Session, Catherine N. Jasons
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unprivileged Status Of The Fifth Amendment Privilege, Mark Berger
The Unprivileged Status Of The Fifth Amendment Privilege, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Brewer V. Williams, Massiah And Miranda: What Is 'Interrogation'? When Does It Matter?, Yale Kamisar
Brewer V. Williams, Massiah And Miranda: What Is 'Interrogation'? When Does It Matter?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
On Christmas Eve, 1968, a ten-year-old girl, Pamela Powers, disappeared while with her family in Des Moines, Iowa.2 Defendant Williams, an escapee from a mental institution and a deeply religious person, 3 was suspected of murdering her, and a warrant was issued for his arrest.4 Williams telephoned a Des Moines lawyer, McKnight, and on his advice surrendered himself to the Davenport, Iowa, police.5 Captain Learning and another Des Moines police officer arranged to drive the 160 miles to Davenport, pick up Williams, and return him directly to Des Moines. 6 Both the trial court 7 and the federal district court8 …
The Supreme Court, Warrantless Searches, And Exigent Circumstances, Richard A. Williamson
The Supreme Court, Warrantless Searches, And Exigent Circumstances, Richard A. Williamson
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Corrections - Prisoners' Constitutional Right Of Access To Courts Imposes Duty On State To Provide Prison Law Libraries, Amanda M. Shaw
Constitutional Law - Corrections - Prisoners' Constitutional Right Of Access To Courts Imposes Duty On State To Provide Prison Law Libraries, Amanda M. Shaw
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Habeas Corpus And Ineffective Representation Of Counsel: The Supreme Court Has Work To Do, Peter W. Tague
Federal Habeas Corpus And Ineffective Representation Of Counsel: The Supreme Court Has Work To Do, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The availability of federal habeas corpus relief for state criminal defendants has always borne a complex relationship to state rules barring defendants from litigating constitutional claims in state court because of procedural defaults in raising those claims. The Warren Court's landmark attempt to resolve this relationship was the 1963 decision in Fay v. Noia, which asserted that a state procedural forfeiture rule could not bar federal habeas review of a constitutional claim unless the defendant had "deliberately bypassed" the procedural opportunity to raise the claim; the Court defined "deliberate bypass" in terms of a defendant's intentional and voluntary relinquishment of …
The Negotiated Guilty Plea: A Framework For Analysis, Richard Adelstein
The Negotiated Guilty Plea: A Framework For Analysis, Richard Adelstein
Richard Adelstein
An early exposition of the price exaction framework and the place of plea bargaining in it.