Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Municipal corporations (2)
- Abandoned property (1)
- Acquittals (1)
- Bills (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
-
- California (1)
- Carriers (1)
- Chattel mortgages (1)
- Consent (1)
- Covenants (1)
- Dividends (1)
- Easements (1)
- Future interests (1)
- Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (1)
- Implied warranties (1)
- Inheritance taxes (1)
- Literary property (1)
- Mortgages (1)
- Negotiable Instruments Law (1)
- Olmstead v. United States (1)
- Parents (1)
- People v. Vasquez (1)
- Robberies (1)
- Search and seizure (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- Trials (1)
- Warrants (1)
- Wills (1)
- Wire tapping (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
The Criminal's Right Of Privacy
The Criminal's Right Of Privacy
Michigan Law Review
The dissent of Mr. Justice Brandeis in the famed wire tapping case has been of especial interest to those who are acquainted with his article in the Harvard Law Review in 1890 on "The Right of Privacy." The law has witnessed few more fascinating developments than the engrafting of this latter concept into the formula of justice, few more conspicuous examples of creative juristic effort. Concerning it Dean Pound has said: "What may almost be called the classical example (of creative activity) is the paper on the Right of Privacy in which Mr. Justice Brandeis, then at the bar, was …
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Crimes-Alibi-Instructions As To Particular Evidence
Crimes-Alibi-Instructions As To Particular Evidence
Michigan Law Review
In a prosecution for robbery the defendants introduced evidence as to an alibi and requested a charge which contained the proposition that the evidence on this point had merely to raise a reasonable doubt as to their presence at the scene of the crime to entitle them to an acquittal. The court refused this request, but had previously instructed the jury that the burden rested with the state to prove the guilt of the. defendants beyond a reasonable doubt. Held, that it was reversible error to refuse the charge requested. People v. Vasquez (Cal. App. r928) 26g Pac. 549.