Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Drugs (2)
- Legalization (2)
- Marijuana (2)
- Narcotics (2)
- Tax Treatment (2)
-
- Attorney-client privilege (1)
- Consumer Fireworks (1)
- Excise (1)
- Fireworks (1)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (1)
- Injury (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- Pennsylvania (1)
- Permanent Vendor (1)
- Permit (1)
- Pigouvian (1)
- Revised Fireworks Act (1)
- Rhode Island Public Laws (1)
- Subsidy (1)
- Tax (1)
- Temporary Vendor (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response To 'Reverse Al Capone-Ism' And The Tax Treatment Of Marijuana Businesses, Douglas A. Kahn, Howard J. Bromberg
Response To 'Reverse Al Capone-Ism' And The Tax Treatment Of Marijuana Businesses, Douglas A. Kahn, Howard J. Bromberg
Other Publications
Mr. Silverberg’s comment stresses that the proponents of the legalization of marijuana have not been able to convince Congress to legalize it, and so it is appropriate for Congress to penalize trafficking in that drug. Apparently, he sees our contention that the penalty adopted in I.R.C. § 280E is irrational and contravenes established punitive jurisprudence as a backdoor attempt to accomplish indirectly, by weakening the penalties on the marijuana businesses, what has not been able to be accomplished by those seeking its federal legalization. That was not the motive for our proposal and is not a fair reading of our …
Response To Dude, Where's My Deduction?, Douglas A. Kahn, Howard J. Bromberg
Response To Dude, Where's My Deduction?, Douglas A. Kahn, Howard J. Bromberg
Other Publications
Mr. Pullin’s thesis is that marijuana should be excluded from § 280E when it is operated legally under state law. However, his preferred solution is that the federal government remove marijuana from Schedules I and II of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (CSA), thereby legalizing it for federal law purposes. Either action would exclude the marijuana business from § 280E.
The Fire Rises: Refining The Pennsylvania Fireworks Law So That Fewer People Get Burned, Sean P. Kraus
The Fire Rises: Refining The Pennsylvania Fireworks Law So That Fewer People Get Burned, Sean P. Kraus
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
On October 30, 2017, the General Assembly of Pennsylvania passed an act that repealed the state’s fireworks law, which had prohibited the sale of most fireworks to Pennsylvanian consumers for nearly 80 years. The law’s replacement generally permits Pennsylvanians over 18 years old to purchase, possess, and use “Consumer Fireworks.” Bottle rockets, firecrackers, Roman candles, and aerial shells are now available to amateur celebrants for holidays like Independence Day and New Year’s Eve. The law also regulates a category of larger “Display Fireworks,” sets standards for fireworks vendors, and introduces a 12-percent excise tax on fireworks sales that serves to …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
2018 Survey Of Rhode Island Case Law
2018 Survey Of Rhode Island Case Law
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.