Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- BMW v Gore (1)
- Capital Punishment (1)
- Civil and criminal penalties (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutionally excessive (1)
-
- Due process (1)
- Grand jury reform (1)
- Independence of grand jury (1)
- Juvenile Offenders (1)
- Legal fictions theory (1)
- Military (1)
- President (1)
- Punitive and compensatory damages (1)
- Roper v. Missouri ex rel. Simmons (543 U.S. 551 (2005)) (1)
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v Campbell (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Moot Court, Roper V. Simmons, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court, Roper V. Simmons, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
The Useful, Dangerous Fiction Of Grand Jury Independence, Niki Kuckes
The Useful, Dangerous Fiction Of Grand Jury Independence, Niki Kuckes
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Executive And Judicial Overreaction In The Guantanamo Cases, Neal K. Katyal
Executive And Judicial Overreaction In The Guantanamo Cases, Neal K. Katyal
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The U.S. Supreme Court in Rasul v. Bush and Al-Odah v. United States held that detainees at Guantanamo Bay may challenge their detentions via writs of habeas corpus. Justice Stevens' majority opinion held that "the federal courts have jurisdiction to determine the legality of the Executive's potentially indefinite detention of individuals who claim to be wholly innocent of wrongdoing." This holding is potentially unbounded, perhaps enabling someone detained at Kandahar or even Diego Garcia to challenge his detention via the great writ. It appears to be a striking break from the 1950 Johnson v. Eisentrager decision, which strongly intimated that …
The Jose Padilla Story, Donna R. Newman