Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Crimes (3)
- Algorithms (1)
- Ambiguity (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Bribery (1)
-
- Convictions (1)
- Criminal liability (1)
- Criminality (1)
- Defenses (1)
- Dishonesty (1)
- Embezzlement (1)
- Excuses (1)
- Extortion (1)
- Facts (1)
- False pretense (1)
- Innocence (1)
- Juries (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Legality (1)
- Mitigation (1)
- Prosecutorial discretion (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Reasoning (1)
- Reversal (1)
- Robots (1)
- Sentences (1)
- Sentencing (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Truth (1)
- Vagueness (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Robot Criminals, Ying Hu
Robot Criminals, Ying Hu
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
When a robot harms humans, are there any grounds for holding it criminally liable for its misconduct? Yes, provided that the robot is capable of making, acting on, and communicating the reasons behind its moral decisions. If such a robot fails to observe the minimum moral standards that society requires of it, labeling it as a criminal can effectively fulfill criminal law’s function of censuring wrongful conduct and alleviating the emotional harm that may be inflicted on human victims.
Imposing criminal liability on robots does not absolve robot manufacturers, trainers, or owners of their individual criminal liability. The former is …
Excuses In Exile, Anders Kaye
Excuses In Exile, Anders Kaye
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Suppose that I have intentionally killed another person and that I have done so without any justification. At first glance, it appears that I am guilty of murder, a very serious crime. Since I am guilty of this very serious crime, the state may inflict a very serious punishment on me—at least many years in prison, if not my whole life or the death penalty. But suppose that one of the following is also true in my case: (A) At the time that I killed my victim, I suffered from a mental disease and, as a result, lacked the substantial …
Reviving Lenity And Honest Belief At The Boundaries Of Criminal Law, John L. Diamond
Reviving Lenity And Honest Belief At The Boundaries Of Criminal Law, John L. Diamond
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
It is a common misconception that there is a line between criminal and innocent conduct that is transparent and fixed. In fact, much of criminal law is fluid and elastic, free, if strategically applied, to label conduct as legal or illegal. In some cases, this reflects crimes that are vaguely defined or imprecise. In other cases, the prohibited conduct simply includes what is so conventionally accepted as legal that the criminal label is perceived as inapplicable until a prosecutor chooses to apply it. The problem of a fluid rather than a fixed line for criminality is that prosecutorial discretion becomes …
Truth And Innocence Procedures To Free Innocent Persons: Beyond The Adversarial System, Tim Bakken
Truth And Innocence Procedures To Free Innocent Persons: Beyond The Adversarial System, Tim Bakken
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Through innocent pleas and innocence procedures, this Article urges a fundamental change to the adversarial system to minimize the risk that factually innocent persons will be convicted of crimes. The current system, based on determining whether the prosecution can prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, results in acquittals of guilty persons when evidence is sparse and convictions of innocent persons when evidence is abundant. It might be easier philosophically to accept that guilty persons will go free than to know that some innocent persons will be convicted and imprisoned, especially in the American justice system where erroneous jury verdicts based …