Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law

Legal Lore - People V. Kief: A Sharp Quillet Of The Law, W. David Curtiss Nov 1975

Legal Lore - People V. Kief: A Sharp Quillet Of The Law, W. David Curtiss

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Eighth Amendment, Beccaria, And The Enlightenment: An Historical Justification For The Weems V. United States Excessive Punishment Doctrine, Deborah A. Schwartz, Jay Wishingrad Apr 1975

The Eighth Amendment, Beccaria, And The Enlightenment: An Historical Justification For The Weems V. United States Excessive Punishment Doctrine, Deborah A. Schwartz, Jay Wishingrad

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.


The History Of Drug Control Laws: American Aspects, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 46 (1975), Nicholas N. Kittrie Jan 1975

The History Of Drug Control Laws: American Aspects, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 46 (1975), Nicholas N. Kittrie

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.


A History Of Illinois Drug Control Laws From 1818 To 1975, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 148 (1975), George N. Leighton, Charles S. Bargiel Jan 1975

A History Of Illinois Drug Control Laws From 1818 To 1975, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 148 (1975), George N. Leighton, Charles S. Bargiel

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Theory Of Justification: Societal Harm As A Prerequisite For Criminal Liability, Paul H. Robinson Jan 1975

A Theory Of Justification: Societal Harm As A Prerequisite For Criminal Liability, Paul H. Robinson

All Faculty Scholarship

All would agree that the criminal law seeks to prevent harmful results rather than to punish evil intent that produces no harm. If one views deterrence as the proper function of the criminal law, a harm requirement is appropriate. To the extent that the criminal law punishes nonharmful conduct, it weakens the stigma and deterrent effect of criminal conviction for harmful conduct. If a defendant who has caused no harm feels that he is punished unjustifiably, rehabilitative efforts will be hampered. Indeed, one may ask: If no harm has been caused, what harm will be deterred by punishment, and what …


The New York Experience, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 134 (1975), H. H. A. Cooper Jan 1975

The New York Experience, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 134 (1975), H. H. A. Cooper

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.