Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (4)
- Agency (2)
- Civil law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Sentencing (2)
-
- Access to justice (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Asymmetric war (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Court data (1)
- Crimes against humanity (1)
- Criminal appeals (1)
- Criminal contempt (1)
- Criminal litigation (1)
- Criminal prosecution (1)
- Damages (1)
- Due process clause (1)
- Enforcement of decrees (1)
- Entrapment (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Federal court docket (1)
- Federal sentencing guidelines (1)
- Grievance procedures for prisoners (1)
- Guidelines (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Ineffective assistance (1)
- International courts (1)
- International criminal court (1)
- International criminal courts (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Creating A People-First Court Data Framework, Lauren Sudeall, Charlotte S. Alexander
Creating A People-First Court Data Framework, Lauren Sudeall, Charlotte S. Alexander
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Most court data are maintained--and most empirical court research is conducted--from the institutional vantage point of the courts. Using the case as the common unit of measurement, data-driven court research typically focuses on metrics such as the size of court dockets, the speed of case processing, judicial decision-making within cases, and the frequency of case events occurring within or resulting from the court system.
This Article sets forth a methodological framework for reconceptualizing and restructuring court data as "people-first"-centered not on the perspective of courts as institutions but on the people who interact with the court system. We reorganize case-level …
Presumptive Use Of Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments, Christopher Slobogin
Presumptive Use Of Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
One proposed reform of the pretrial detention system is the adoption of risk assessment instruments to assist courts in determining who is at risk of reoffending or a flight risk. This Response to Professor Melissa Hamilton's Article, Modelling Pretrial Detention, proposes that under most circumstances the results of well-validated instruments should not only inform pretrial outcomes but should dictate them, on the ground that such results are more likely to be accurate than judicial decision-making. The Response also provides evidence that this reform would significantly reduce pretrial detention rates and, consistent with Professor Hamilton's findings, avoid producing racially disparate results.
The Case For A Federal Criminal Court System (And Sentencing Reform), Christopher Slobogin
The Case For A Federal Criminal Court System (And Sentencing Reform), Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In their article in this issue, Professors Peter Menell and Ryan Vacca describe a federal court docket that is overloaded and unable to process cases efficiently. As they depict it, justice in the federal courts is either delayed or denied, disparity in legal outcomes among circuits is increasing, and the Supreme Court is falling farther and farther behind in resolving circuit splits. While these problems have been around for a while, Menell and Vacca argue they are getting worse and will only continue to worsen if radical action is not taken. Their article provides enough of a factual record to …
Integrating The Access To Justice Movement, Lauren Sudeall
Integrating The Access To Justice Movement, Lauren Sudeall
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Last fall, advocates of social change came together at the A2J Summit at Fordham University School of Law and discussed how to galvanize a national access to justice movement - who would it include, and what would or should it attempt to achieve? One important preliminary question we tackled was how such a movement would define "justice," and whether it would apply only to the civil justice system. Although the phrase "access to justice" is not exclusively civil in nature, more often than not it is taken to have that connotation. Lost in the interpretation is an opportunity to engage …
Appeals By The Prosecution, Nancy J. King, Michael Heise
Appeals By The Prosecution, Nancy J. King, Michael Heise
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Scholarly and public debates about criminal appeals have largely taken place in an empiri- cal vacuum. This study builds on our prior empirical work exploring defense-initiated criminal appeals and focuses on criminal appeals by state and federal prosecutors. Exploit- ing data drawn from a recently released national sample of appeals by state prosecutors decided in 2010, as well as data from all appeals by federal prosecutors to the U.S. Courts of Appeals terminated in the years 2011 through 2016, we provide a detailed snapshot of noncapital, direct appeals by prosecutors, including extensive information on crime type, claims raised, type of …
Fairness, Legitimacy, And Selection Decisions In International Criminal Law, Jonathan Hafetz
Fairness, Legitimacy, And Selection Decisions In International Criminal Law, Jonathan Hafetz
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The selection of situations and cases remains one of the most vexing challenges facing the International Criminal Court (ICC) and other international criminal tribunals. Since Nuremberg, international criminal law (ICL) has experienced significant progress in developing procedural safeguards designed to protect the fair trial rights of the accused. But it continues to lag in the fairness of its selection decisions as measured against the norm of equal application of law, whether in the disproportionate focus on certain regions (as with the ICC's focus on Africa), the application of criminal responsibility only to one side of a conflict, or the continued …
Finding "Tapia Error": How Circuit Courts Have Misread 'Tapia V. United States' And Shortchanged The Penological Goals Of The Sentencing Reform Act, Matt J. Gornick
Finding "Tapia Error": How Circuit Courts Have Misread 'Tapia V. United States' And Shortchanged The Penological Goals Of The Sentencing Reform Act, Matt J. Gornick
Vanderbilt Law Review
The American criminal justice system is called many things; "compassionate" is usually not one of them. Yet in the course of federal criminal proceedings, a sentencing hearing allows a judge to convey compassion toward a defendant, if only to say, "I'm sorry about your situation, but this is how I must apply the law." Likewise, a defendant might throw herself on the mercy of the court in hopes that the judge exercises discretion compassionately. Mitigating factors and downward departures suggest that judges are capable of doing so. But how does a sentencing judge show compassion, as opposed to simply feeling …
Neuroscientists In Court, Owen D. Jones, Anthony D. Wagner, David L. Faigman, Marcus E. Raichle
Neuroscientists In Court, Owen D. Jones, Anthony D. Wagner, David L. Faigman, Marcus E. Raichle
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being offered in court cases. Consequently, the legal system needs neuroscientists to act as expert witnesses who can explain the limitations and interpretations of neuroscientific findings so that judges and jurors can make informed and appropriate inferences. The growing role of neuroscientists in court means that neuroscientists should be aware of important differences between the scientific and legal fields, and, especially, how scientific facts can be easily misunderstood by non-scientists,including judges and jurors.
This article describes similarities, as well as key differences, of legal and scientific cultures. And it explains six key principles about neuroscience that …
A Social Psychology Model Of The Perceived Legitimacy Of International Criminal Courts, Stuart Ford
A Social Psychology Model Of The Perceived Legitimacy Of International Criminal Courts, Stuart Ford
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
There is a large body of literature arguing that positive perceived legitimacy is a critical factor in the success of international criminal courts, and that courts can be engineered in such a way that they will be positively perceived by adjusting factors such as their institutional structure and outreach efforts. But in many situations the perceived legitimacy of international criminal courts has almost nothing to do with these factors. This Article takes the latest research in social psychology and applies it to survey data about perceptions of international criminal courts in order to understand how affected populations form attitudes about …
Rethinking The Federal Role In State Criminal Justice, Nancy J. King, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Rethinking The Federal Role In State Criminal Justice, Nancy J. King, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Essay argues that federal habeas review of state criminal cases squanders resources the federal government should be using to help states reform their systems of defense representation. A 2007 empirical study reveals that federal habeas review is inaccessible to most state prisoners convicted of non-capital crimes, and offers no realistic hope of relief for those who reach federal court. As a means of correcting or deterring constitutional error in non-capital cases, habeas is failing and cannot be fixed. Drawing upon these findings as well as the Supreme Court's most recent decision applying the Suspension Clause, the authors propose that …
Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Wolf? The International Criminal Court As A Weapon Of Asymmetric Warfare, W. C. Austin
Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Wolf? The International Criminal Court As A Weapon Of Asymmetric Warfare, W. C. Austin
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The United States is engaged in a war on terror against enemies who wage "asymmetric war" through terrorism, media manipulation, and "law-fare"---exploiting judicial processes to achieve political or military objectives.
This Article explores whether the fledgling International Criminal Court (ICC) could eventually be exploited by these groups as a tool of asymmetric "law-fare." It briefly traces the history of the ICC and recounts why the United States opposes the Court. Examining the methods of asymmetric war, the Authors then explore whether the ICC could be exploited by future asymmetric warriors.
The Authors describe three asymmetric methods that could be used …
When Process Affects Punishment: Differences In Sentences After Guilty Plea, Bench Trial, And Jury Trial In Five Guidelines States, Nancy J. King, David A. Soule, Sara Steen, Robert R. Weidner
When Process Affects Punishment: Differences In Sentences After Guilty Plea, Bench Trial, And Jury Trial In Five Guidelines States, Nancy J. King, David A. Soule, Sara Steen, Robert R. Weidner
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The research reported in this Essay examines process discounts-differences in sentences imposed for the same offense, depending upon whether the conviction was by jury trial, bench trial, or guilty plea-in five states that use judicial sentencing guidelines. Few guidelines systems expressly recognize "plea agreement" as an acceptable basis for departure, and none authorizes judges to vary sentences based upon whether or not the defendant waived his right to a jury trial and opted for a bench trial. Nevertheless, we predicted that because of the cost savings resulting from waivers, judges and prosecutors in any sentencing system would ensure that guilty …
Judicial Oversight Of Negotiated Sentences In A World Of Bargained Punishment, Nancy J. King
Judicial Oversight Of Negotiated Sentences In A World Of Bargained Punishment, Nancy J. King
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Prosecutors control statutory ranges by selecting charges. In addition, prosecutors decide whether to use or forego special sentencing statutes that carry mandatory minimum penalties higher than the maximum Guidelines sentence that would otherwise apply to the defendant's conduct, as well as statutes that authorize a sentence lower than the minimum Guidelines sentence that would otherwise apply ("safety valve," "substantial assistance," and Rule 35 reductions). By creating these additional provisions and then removing any effective judicial oversight of their application, Congress has expanded the opportunities for prosecutors to decide when to opt out of the national Guidelines and when to abide …
The Ills Of The Federal Sentencing Guidelines And The Search For A Cure: Using Sentence Entrapment To Combat Governmental Manipulation Of Sentencing, Robert S. Johnson
The Ills Of The Federal Sentencing Guidelines And The Search For A Cure: Using Sentence Entrapment To Combat Governmental Manipulation Of Sentencing, Robert S. Johnson
Vanderbilt Law Review
Consider the following scenario:' The police conduct an under- cover sting operation targeting drug traffickers. An undercover officer approaches a suspected drug dealer and arranges to purchase crack cocaine. Over a period of five weeks, the suspect makes seven sales to the officer, and the police arrest him after the final sale. The total amount sold by the defendant was 50.4 grams, just enough to place him within the mandatory minimum sentence of ten years. Had he sold up to 49.9 grams, his mandatory minimum sentence would only have been five years. The district court hearing this case found it …
Sentence Credit For Pre-Trial Defendants Released To Residential Detention Facilities, Maryellen Sullivan
Sentence Credit For Pre-Trial Defendants Released To Residential Detention Facilities, Maryellen Sullivan
Vanderbilt Law Review
Most individuals consider continued confinement to a residential detention facility and denial of access to phone, mail, and family visits to constitute involuntary detention. The majority of the federal courts of appeal do not agree, however, and will not grant sentence credit to a federal offender for time spent, as a condition of bond, in a "treatment center" or "halfway house."' These same courts, without exception, grant sentence credit to individuals who are remanded to these residen- tial facilities after conviction. This inequity violates the purpose of the Bail Reform Act of 1966 (the "Act"), which ensures even-handed and uniform …
Criminal Prosecution Of Bank Personnel Under The Misapplication Statute: The Proper Mens Rea Standard For Establishing Intent, William J. Holley, Ii
Criminal Prosecution Of Bank Personnel Under The Misapplication Statute: The Proper Mens Rea Standard For Establishing Intent, William J. Holley, Ii
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Recent Development advocates legislative adoption of a new Misapplication Statute as a long range solution to the courts'continued debate over the appropriate mens rea standard and judicial adoption of a uniform approach as a short run alternative. Part II of this Recent Development traces the various mens rea standards that courts have applied under the Misapplication Statute. Part III discusses the current confusion over the appropriate section 656 mens rea standard by looking at three recent circuit court decisions.' Part IV advocates the adoption of a new Misapplication Statute similar to the approach that the National Com-mission on Reform …
Appellate Review Of Legal But Excessive Sentences: A Comparative Study, Gerhard O.W. Mueller, Fre Le Poole
Appellate Review Of Legal But Excessive Sentences: A Comparative Study, Gerhard O.W. Mueller, Fre Le Poole
Vanderbilt Law Review
Classical penology was conceived in France in the eighteenth century, and then eclipsed all over the world in the nineteenth, when Lombroso conjured up the picture of the born criminal. It was finally laid to rest in the United States in the twentieth century. Its basic tenet had been simple enough: the legislature in its infinite wisdom would seek and find the appropriate punishment for every crime.This can be accomplished if a crime is defined narrowly enough, perhaps by the creation of subcategories of that crime, so as to encompass all potential perpetrators who will each incur the same amount …
The Federal Courts And Indirect Criminal Contempt, Philip L. Peeler
The Federal Courts And Indirect Criminal Contempt, Philip L. Peeler
Vanderbilt Law Review
The purpose of this note will be to deal with one method of implementation, i.e., the use of the court's power to punish for criminal contempt particularly in regard to decrees, and the extent to which and under what circumstances persons not directly named in those decrees may be subjected to punishment for conduct of a criminal nature which interferes with the enforcement of those decrees...
Judicial decisions which conflict with settled moral and ethnological convictions are not translated overnight into effective standards of acceptable behavior. The decisions, however, must be implemented.'The purpose of this note will be to deal …
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
RECENT CASES
AGENCY--INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR--"ONE WAY LEASE" EFFECTIVE TO TERMINATE RELATIONSHIP
====================================
COURTS--CIVIL RIGHTS ACT--IMMUNITY OF JUDGE FOR ACTS COMMITTED IN THE EXERCISE OF A JUDICIAL FUNCTION
====================================
COURTS--CONTEMPT--VIOLATION OF COURT RULE BANNING PHOTOGRAPHY
====================================
CRIMINAL LAW--ENTRAPMENT BY STATE OFFICIAL AS A DEFENSE TO FEDERAL PROSECUTION
====================================
DAMAGES--BREACH OF WARRANTY--RECOVERY FOR LOSS OF PROFITS
====================================
FEDERAL COURTS--CHOICE OF LAW--APPLICATION OF ERIE DOCTRINE TO DIVERSITY CASES INVOLVING FEDERAL COMMERCIAL PAPER
====================================
TORTS--BATTERY--CONSENT OF MINOR TO SIMPLE OPERATION AS A DEFENSE
====================================
TORTS--DUTY TO ACT--EMPLOYER'S ASSUMPTION OF A DUTY BY GIVING MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS TO EMPLOYEES
====================================
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Recent Cases
Agency--Liability of Master for Servant's Acts--State Permit to Operate
Agency--Possession as Indicia of Ownership
Constitutional Law--Aliens--Detention Where Deportations is Impossible
Courts--Contempt--Delay in Summary Punishment
Criminal Law--Habitual Criminal Statutes--Meaning of Previous Conviction Requirement
Domestic Relations--Liability of Husband for Necessaries of Wife Rightfully Living Apart
Income Taxation--Excludibility from Gross Income of Payment over Ceiling Price
Income Taxation--Taxable Income--Claim of Right
Procedure--Grand Jury--Motion to Expunge Defamatory Remarks in Report
Procedure--Statute of Limitations--Retroactive Operation
Statutes--Holding of Unconstitutionality Overruled--Necessity for Re-Enactment
Wills--Contest--Interest of Legatee's Representative