Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Search (2)
- Seizure (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
-
- Bill C-36 (1)
- Canada (1)
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Checkpoint (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Enumerated (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Fundamental Justice (1)
- Identification (1)
- Identity card (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- PATRIOT Act (1)
- Probable cause (1)
- Rights (1)
- Science and Technology (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- United States (1)
- Warrants (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Indianapolis V. Edmond And The Original Understanding Of The Fourth Amendment, Bruce Newman
Indianapolis V. Edmond And The Original Understanding Of The Fourth Amendment, Bruce Newman
ExpressO
In this article I examine to what extent Indianapolis v. Edmond is in keeping with the original understanding of the Fourth Amendment. I conclude that the Founders were much more concerned with searches of real property, often insisting, not only on suspicion, but also a on warrant when searches of real property are involved. Secondly, while the Founders did not consider warrants necessary for searches and seizures off of real property (which for the sake of simplicity I call searches in public areas) the evidence suggests suspicion was required. Indeed, the Fourth Amendment was a direct response to the British …
National Identity Cards: Fourth And Fifth Amendment Issues, Daniel J. Steinbock
National Identity Cards: Fourth And Fifth Amendment Issues, Daniel J. Steinbock
ExpressO
In the past two years there have been serious calls for a national identity system whose centerpiece would be some form of national identity card. Such a system is seen mainly as a tool against terrorists, but also as a useful response to illegal immigration, identity theft, and electoral fraud. Both proponents and opponents have noted the potential constitutional problems of such an identity system, but as yet there has been no published legal analysis of these questions. This article aims to fill that gap by analyzing the Fourth and Fifth Amendment issues in two major features of any likely …
The Self-Incrimination Clause Explained And Its Future Predicted, Ronald J. Allen
The Self-Incrimination Clause Explained And Its Future Predicted, Ronald J. Allen
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Canadian Fundamental Justice And American Due Process: Two Models For A Guarantee Of Basic Adjudicative Fairness, David M. Siegel
Canadian Fundamental Justice And American Due Process: Two Models For A Guarantee Of Basic Adjudicative Fairness, David M. Siegel
ExpressO
This paper traces how the Supreme Courts of Canada and the United States have each used the basic guarantee of adjudicative fairness in their respective constitutions to effect revolutions in their countries’ criminal justice systems, through two different jurisprudential models for this development. It identifies a relationship between two core constitutional structures, the basic guarantee and enumerated rights, and shows how this relationship can affect the degree to which entrenched constitutional rights actually protect individuals. It explains that the different models for the relationship between the basic guarantee and enumerated rights adopted in Canada and the United States, an “expansive …
The Coherence Of Orthodox Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Samuel C. Rickless
The Coherence Of Orthodox Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Samuel C. Rickless
ExpressO
In the legal academy it is widely believed that the U.S. Supreme Court's orthodox (post-Katz, pre-Houghton) fourth amendment jurisprudence is theoretically incoherent. In particular, the Court has been criticized (on doctrinal and textual grounds) for accepting (i) Justice Harlan's definition of a "search" as an infringement of a subjective expectation of privacy that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable, (ii) the Warrant Requirement and Probable Cause Requirement (according to which searches and seizures without a warrant or probable cause are presumptively unreasonable), and (iii) the Exclusionary Rule (according to which any evidence obtained in violation of a person’s fourth …