Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (22)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (20)
- Selected Works (19)
- SelectedWorks (14)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (8)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- New York Law School (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Kennesaw State University (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Montclair State University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- UIdaho Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of California, Irvine School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (19)
- Evidence (19)
- Fourth Amendment (14)
- Sixth Amendment (10)
- Constitution (9)
-
- New York (9)
- Criminal Law (8)
- Due Process (8)
- Supreme Court (8)
- Constitutional law (7)
- Crime (7)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Cruel and unusual punishment (7)
- Drugs (7)
- Exclusionary rule (7)
- Right to counsel (7)
- Search and Seizure (7)
- Fifth Amendment (6)
- Miranda (6)
- Criminal (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Searches and seizures (5)
- Suppress (5)
- Suppression (5)
- Testimony (5)
- Automobile (4)
- California (4)
- Capital punishment (4)
- Car (4)
- Death penalty (4)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (22)
- Touro Law Review (20)
- Beau James Brock (6)
- Florida Law Review (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Charles B Frye (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Ira P. Robbins (2)
- Linus Koh (2)
- Paul J Larkin Jr. (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Abdullahi Saliu Ishola (1)
- Adam Lamparello (1)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Christopher J. Truxler (1)
- Daudi Mwita Nyamaka Mr. (1)
- David B Kopel (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Elizabeth Rumley (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 122
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Appellate Division, First Department - People V. Martinez, Jean K. Delisle
Appellate Division, First Department - People V. Martinez, Jean K. Delisle
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Fourth Department - People V. Buchanan, Jacqulyn Vann
Appellate Division, Fourth Department - People V. Buchanan, Jacqulyn Vann
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Allocating The Costs Of Parental Free Exercise: Striking A New Balance Between Sincere Religious Belief And A Child's Right To Medical Treatment , Paul A. Monopoli
Allocating The Costs Of Parental Free Exercise: Striking A New Balance Between Sincere Religious Belief And A Child's Right To Medical Treatment , Paul A. Monopoli
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Possession Of Child Pornography: Should You Be Convicted When The Computer Cache Does The Saving For You?, Giannina Marin
Possession Of Child Pornography: Should You Be Convicted When The Computer Cache Does The Saving For You?, Giannina Marin
Florida Law Review
“For years, defense lawyers have argued the ‘young and stupid’ semidefense for their youthful clients. Now, we can have the ‘I didn’t know it was on the hard drive’ objection for the unsophisticated computer user in child pornography cases—or at least they can in the 9th Circuit.” This quote, appearing on the website of an East Texas criminal defense law firm, refers to the outcome of United States v. Kuchinski. In Kuchinski, the defendant’s computer contained, in various forms, more than 15,000 images of child pornography. There was no question that Kuchinski’s volitional viewing of the images on the Internet …
Substantive Due Process: Sex Toys After Lawrence Williams V. Morgan, 478 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 2007), Michael J. Hooi
Substantive Due Process: Sex Toys After Lawrence Williams V. Morgan, 478 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 2007), Michael J. Hooi
Florida Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Honor Of Walter O. Weyrauch: The Case For Overturning Williams V. Florida And The Six-Person Jury: History, Law, And Empirical Evidence, Alisa Smith, Michael J. Saks
In Honor Of Walter O. Weyrauch: The Case For Overturning Williams V. Florida And The Six-Person Jury: History, Law, And Empirical Evidence, Alisa Smith, Michael J. Saks
Florida Law Review
After 700 years of common-law history and nearly 200 years of constitutional history, the Supreme Court concluded that the constitutionally permissible minimum jury size could not be inferred from the language or the history of the Constitution. The answer, said the Court in Williams v. Florida, could be found only through a “functional analysis” of the performance of smaller juries (that is, empirical examination of the behavior of different-sized juries). The Court implicitly abandoned that analysis in Ballew v. Georgia, when it held that juries with fewer than six members were unconstitutional-a decision based on nothing more than the ipse …
California's Constitutional Right To Privacy, J. Clark Kelso
California's Constitutional Right To Privacy, J. Clark Kelso
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Alvarez-Machain: Kidnapping In The "War On Drugs" - A Matter Of Executive Discretion Or Lawlessness?, Michael G. Mckinnon
United States V. Alvarez-Machain: Kidnapping In The "War On Drugs" - A Matter Of Executive Discretion Or Lawlessness?, Michael G. Mckinnon
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Punishment Need Not Fit The Crime: Harmelin V. Michigan And The Eigth Amendment, Scott K. Petersen
The Punishment Need Not Fit The Crime: Harmelin V. Michigan And The Eigth Amendment, Scott K. Petersen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Psychotherapist And Patient In The California Supreme Court: Ground Lost And Ground Regained, Stanley Mosk
Psychotherapist And Patient In The California Supreme Court: Ground Lost And Ground Regained, Stanley Mosk
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Victim Harm, Retributivism And Capital Punishment: A Philosophy Critique Of Payne V. Tennessee , R. P. Peerenboom
Victim Harm, Retributivism And Capital Punishment: A Philosophy Critique Of Payne V. Tennessee , R. P. Peerenboom
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Of An Unborn Child: Jurisprudential Inconsistencies In Wrongful Death, Criminal Homicide, And Abortion Cases, Murphy S. Klasing
The Death Of An Unborn Child: Jurisprudential Inconsistencies In Wrongful Death, Criminal Homicide, And Abortion Cases, Murphy S. Klasing
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court 2009 Term Overview And 2010 Term Preview, Erwin Chemerinsky, Joan Biskupic, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
The Supreme Court 2009 Term Overview And 2010 Term Preview, Erwin Chemerinsky, Joan Biskupic, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Martin A. Schwartz
No abstract provided.
Commentary: Pleau-Sharing, Jonah J. Horwitz
Commentary: Pleau-Sharing, Jonah J. Horwitz
The Docket
In light of recent debate about the proper roles of federal and state governments, Jonah J. Horwitz laments how little attention has been paid to federal encroachment on the prosecution of commonplace crimes, specifically as it pertains to the death penalty controversy in United States v. Pleau.
The Constitution Limits Of The "National Consensus" Doctrine In Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence, Kevin White
The Constitution Limits Of The "National Consensus" Doctrine In Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence, Kevin White
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Incompetent Plea Bargaining And Extrajudicial Reforms, Stephanos Bibas
Incompetent Plea Bargaining And Extrajudicial Reforms, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
Last year, in Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, a five-to-four majority of the Supreme Court held that incompetent lawyering that causes a defendant to reject a plea offer can constitute deficient performance, and the resulting loss of a favorable plea bargain can constitute cognizable prejudice, under the Sixth Amendment. This commentary, published as part of the Harvard Law Review’s Supreme Court issue, analyzes both decisions. The majority and dissenting opinions almost talked past each other, reaching starkly different conclusions because they started from opposing premises: contemporary and pragmatic versus historical and formalist. Belatedly, the Court noticed …
Police Can Stop You For Having A License Plate Bracket On Your Car, Beau James Brock, Rikki Weger
Police Can Stop You For Having A License Plate Bracket On Your Car, Beau James Brock, Rikki Weger
Beau James Brock
The Fourth Amendment must be protected from police excesses. Now, law enforcement is relying upon the most hyper-technical of violations to stop a vehicle. Both attorneys and judges must guard against the temptation that the ends will justify the means, only to find out later we sold out our freedom to the golden calf of drug interdiction.
The Criminalization Of Maternal Substance Abuse: A Quick Fix To A Complex Problem, Carol Jean Sovinski
The Criminalization Of Maternal Substance Abuse: A Quick Fix To A Complex Problem, Carol Jean Sovinski
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mandatory Chemical Castration For Perpetrators Of Sex Offenses Against Children: Following California's Lead, Peter J. Gimino Iii
Mandatory Chemical Castration For Perpetrators Of Sex Offenses Against Children: Following California's Lead, Peter J. Gimino Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
It Is Broken: Breaking The Inertia Of The Exclusionary Rule, L. Timothy Perrin, H. Mitchell Caldwell, Carol A. Chase
It Is Broken: Breaking The Inertia Of The Exclusionary Rule, L. Timothy Perrin, H. Mitchell Caldwell, Carol A. Chase
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Exclusionary Rule: Fix It, But Fix It Right - A Critique Of If It's Broken, Fix It: Moving Beyond The Exclusionary Rule, Gregory D. Totten, Peter D. Kossoris, Ebbe B. Ebbesen
The Exclusionary Rule: Fix It, But Fix It Right - A Critique Of If It's Broken, Fix It: Moving Beyond The Exclusionary Rule, Gregory D. Totten, Peter D. Kossoris, Ebbe B. Ebbesen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Administrative Replacements: How Much Can They Do?, Laurie L. Levenson
Administrative Replacements: How Much Can They Do?, Laurie L. Levenson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
How To Move Beyond The Exclusionary Rule: Structuring Judicial Response To Legislative Reform Efforts, Harold J. Krent
How To Move Beyond The Exclusionary Rule: Structuring Judicial Response To Legislative Reform Efforts, Harold J. Krent
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Moving Further Beyond, Thomas M. Reavley
An Invitation To Dialogue: Exploring The Pepperdine Proposal To Move Beyond The Exclusionary Rule, L. Timothy Perrin, H. Mitchell Caldwell, Carol A. Chase
An Invitation To Dialogue: Exploring The Pepperdine Proposal To Move Beyond The Exclusionary Rule, L. Timothy Perrin, H. Mitchell Caldwell, Carol A. Chase
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Model Penal Code’S Wrong Turn: Renunciation As A Defense To Criminal Conspiracy, R. Michael Cassidy, Gregory I. Massing
The Model Penal Code’S Wrong Turn: Renunciation As A Defense To Criminal Conspiracy, R. Michael Cassidy, Gregory I. Massing
Florida Law Review
While the Model Penal Code was certainly one of the most influential developments in criminal law in the past century, the American Law Institute (ALI) took a seriously wrong turn by recognizing “renunciation” as a defense to the crime of conspiracy. Under the Model Penal Code formulation, a member of a conspiracy who later disavows the agreement and thwarts its objective (for example, by notifying authorities of the planned crime in order to prevent its completion) is afforded a complete defense to conspiracy liability. This defense has enormous implications for crimes involving national security and terrorism, which are typically planned …
The Open Road And The Traffic Stop: Narratives And Counter-Narratives Of The American Dream, Nancy Leong
The Open Road And The Traffic Stop: Narratives And Counter-Narratives Of The American Dream, Nancy Leong
Florida Law Review
American culture is steeped in the mythology of the open road. In our collective imagination, the road represents freedom, escape, friendship, romance, and above all, the possibility for a better life. But our shared dream of the open road comes to a halt in the mundane reality of the traffic stop—a judicially authorized policing procedure in which an officer may pull over a vehicle if she has cause to believe the driver has committed even the most minor traffic violation. I examine the cultural texts—books, movies, songs—celebrating the open road and juxtapose them against those documenting the traffic stop. The …
Separate But Equal: Miranda's Rights To Silence And Counsel, Steven P. Grossman
Separate But Equal: Miranda's Rights To Silence And Counsel, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
Three decades ago, the Supreme Court created a dubious distinction between the rights accorded to suspects in custody who invoke their right to silence and who invoke their right to counsel. This distinction significantly disadvantages those who do not have the good sense or good fortune to specify they want an attorney when they invoke their right to remain silent. This article argues that this distinction was flawed at its genesis and that it has led to judicial decisions that are inconsistent, make little sense, and permit police behavior that substantially diminishes the right to silence as described in Miranda …