Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Insurance Law (2)
-
- Litigation (2)
- Civil Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Elder Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Torts (1)
- Keyword
-
- Abstention (1)
- Bullying (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Eighth amendment (1)
-
- Election law (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- False claims act (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Hospice (1)
- Insurance policies (1)
- Insurance policy (1)
- Jails (1)
- Ohio (1)
- Policy interpretation (1)
- Prisons (1)
- Qualified immunity (1)
- Qui tam (1)
- RCV (1)
- Ranked choice voting (1)
- Relator (1)
- Rooker-feldman (1)
- Schools (1)
- Solitary confinement (1)
- Textualism (1)
- Voting (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Courts
One Vote, Two Votes, Three Votes, Four: How Ranked Choice Voting Burdens Voting Rights And More, Brandon Bryer
One Vote, Two Votes, Three Votes, Four: How Ranked Choice Voting Burdens Voting Rights And More, Brandon Bryer
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rejecting Word Worship: An Integrative Approach To Judicial Construction Of Insurance Policies, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Erik S. Knutsen
Rejecting Word Worship: An Integrative Approach To Judicial Construction Of Insurance Policies, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Erik S. Knutsen
University of Cincinnati Law Review
Insurance coverage litigation is a quest for discerning meaning: Does the insurance policy cover the loss at issue? Construing the insurance policy, courts attempt to give legal effect to what the document purports to command. But what were the intentions and expectations of insurer and insured? Do those intentions even matter? Or is only the written text of the policy relevant to the coverage result? Courts addressing these questions typically frame the interpretative choice as one of strict textualism versus contextual functionalism.
In many, perhaps even most situations, text and context align to create an “easy” case. If a factory …
Challenging Solitary Confinement Through State Constitutions, Alison Gordon
Challenging Solitary Confinement Through State Constitutions, Alison Gordon
University of Cincinnati Law Review
Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has resulted in limited scrutiny of solitary confinement despite the known harms associated with the practice. The two-part test established by the federal courts to evaluate Eighth Amendment claims and limitations on challenging prison conditions under the Prison Litigation Reform Act can make it difficult to establish that solitary confinement is cruel and unusual punishment.
State constitutional challenges to solitary confinement are underexplored. Nearly all state constitutions contain an equivalent provision to the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. State courts need not be bound by federal jurisprudence in interpreting the scope of the state …
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: The Case For Putting It To Work, Not To Rest, Bradford Higdon
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine: The Case For Putting It To Work, Not To Rest, Bradford Higdon
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proof Of Objective Falsehood: Liability Under The False Claims Act For Hospice Providers, Sebastian West
Proof Of Objective Falsehood: Liability Under The False Claims Act For Hospice Providers, Sebastian West
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Immunity Confusion: Why Are Ohio Courts Unable To Apply A Clear Immunity Standard In School-Bullying Cases?, Liam Mcmillin
Immunity Confusion: Why Are Ohio Courts Unable To Apply A Clear Immunity Standard In School-Bullying Cases?, Liam Mcmillin
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Power Of Suggestion: Can A Judicial Standing Order Disrupt A Norm?, Kimberly A. Jolson
The Power Of Suggestion: Can A Judicial Standing Order Disrupt A Norm?, Kimberly A. Jolson
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.