Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Allocations (1)
- Authenticity (1)
- Binary classification tests (1)
- Children (1)
-
- Colorado State Court of Appeals (1)
- Compelling interests (1)
- Demonstrators (1)
- Disturbing speech (1)
- False-negatives (1)
- False-positives (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Formal allocations (1)
- Formalities (1)
- Ginsberg v. New York (1)
- Intentional harm (1)
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress (1)
- Political speech (1)
- Probate-error risks (1)
- Protected speech (1)
- Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. Scott (1)
- Uniform Probate Code (1)
- Validity (1)
- Will-execution (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Think Of The Children: Using Iied To Reformulate Disturbing Speech Restrictions, Richard Lorren Jolly
Think Of The Children: Using Iied To Reformulate Disturbing Speech Restrictions, Richard Lorren Jolly
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The Colorado State Court of Appeals recently upheld an injunction restricting public displays of aborted fetuses. The court held that the restriction passed strict scrutiny because the state had a compelling interest in protecting children from the psychological harm of “disturbing images” and the injunction was narrowly tailored. This marked the first time an injunction had been upheld on this rationale. This Note critiques that holding and others. It contends that while some federal and state courts have recognized the interest in protecting the psychological wellbeing of children from disturbing speech as compelling, the interest is not supported by precedent. …
Minimizing Probate-Error Risk, Mark Glover
Minimizing Probate-Error Risk, Mark Glover
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Probate-error risk is the possibility that a court will incorrectly assess the authenticity of a will. By prescribing the method courts use to evaluate the authenticity of wills, the law of will-execution allocates probate-error risk between false-positive outcomes and false-negative outcomes. When a court validates an inauthentic will, it creates a false-positive outcome. When a court invalidates an authentic will, it creates a false-negative outcome. Because false-positive outcomes result in the admission to probate of inauthentic wills and false-negative outcomes result in the denial of probate of genuine wills, both can be characterized as probate errors. This framework has been …