Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Assertion (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Conduct (1)
- Conflict of law (1)
- Corporate law (1)
-
- Corporations (1)
- Declarant (1)
- Define (1)
- Definitions (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Exclusions to hearsay (1)
- Federal rules of evidence (1)
- Fre 801 (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Hearsay exclusionary rule (1)
- Judicial (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Legislature (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Multistate rule (1)
- Out-of-court statement (1)
- Products liability (1)
- Relevance (1)
- Rule 801 (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Rules of evidence (1)
- Statements (1)
- Substantive law (1)
- Successor corporation products liability (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Assertion And Hearsay, Richard Lloret
Assertion And Hearsay, Richard Lloret
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
This article explores the characteristics and functions of assertion and considers how the term influences the definition of hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence 801. Rule 801(a) defines hearsay by limiting it to words and conduct intended as an assertion, but the rule does not define the term assertion. Courts and legal scholars have focused relatively little attention on the nature and definition of assertion. That is unfortunate, because assertion is a robust concept that has been the subject of intense philosophic study over recent decades. Assertion is not a mere cypher standing in for whatever speech or conduct one …
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Most state rules of substantive law, whether legislative or judicial, ordinarily adjust rights and obligations among local parties with respect to local events. Conventional choice of law methodologies for adjudicating disputes with multistate connections all start from an explicit or implicit assumption of a choice between such locally oriented substantive rules. This article reveals, for the first time, that some state rules of substantive law ordinarily adjust rights and obligations with respect to parties and events connected to more than one state and only occasionally apply to wholly local matters. For these rules I use the term “nominally domestic rules …