Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- The University of Maine (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- 1891-1974 (6)
- Earl Warren (6)
- United States/Supreme Court (6)
- Courts (4)
- Constitutional interpretation (3)
-
- Federalism (3)
- Judicial review (2)
- Administration of criminal justice (1)
- Administrative discretion (1)
- Affirmative action programs (1)
- Africa (1)
- Arrow's Theorem (1)
- Article III (1)
- Attitudinal model (1)
- Attorney's Fees (1)
- Bennett v. Spear (1)
- Buckhannon (1)
- Burger Court (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Catalyst Theory (1)
- Charity and philanthropy (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Congressional Intent (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decisionmaking (1)
- Constitutional history (1)
- Constitutional torts (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 24 of 24
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Law As Largess: Shifting Paradigms Of Law For The Poor, Deborah M. Weissman
Law As Largess: Shifting Paradigms Of Law For The Poor, Deborah M. Weissman
Deborah M. Weissman
The article examines the tension between the principles of the Rule of Law and cultural norms of self-sufficiency. It begins by reviewing the principles of the Rule of Law as an ideal, the pursuit of which has led to historical efforts to meet the legal needs of the poor. It then examines recent legal events including federal statutory changes, three Supreme Court cases, and a federal circuit court case which have limited legal resources for those who cannot pay. The article then examines these developments in the context of a sea-change in the political environment of the nation, coinciding with …
A Subversive Strand Of The Warren Court, Gary Peller
A Subversive Strand Of The Warren Court, Gary Peller
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
How The Supreme Court Delivers Fire And Ice To State Criminal Justice, Ronald F. Wright
How The Supreme Court Delivers Fire And Ice To State Criminal Justice, Ronald F. Wright
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Causation, Constitutional Principles, And The Jurisprudential Legacy Of The Warren Court, Michelle Adams
Causation, Constitutional Principles, And The Jurisprudential Legacy Of The Warren Court, Michelle Adams
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Warren Court, Criminal Procedure Reform, And Retributive Punishment, Darryl K. Brown
The Warren Court, Criminal Procedure Reform, And Retributive Punishment, Darryl K. Brown
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Come Back To The Nickel And Five:* Tracing The Warren Court's Pursuit Of Equal Justice Under Law, Jim Chen
Come Back To The Nickel And Five:* Tracing The Warren Court's Pursuit Of Equal Justice Under Law, Jim Chen
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Irreparability Resurrected?: Does A Recalibrated Irreparable Injury Rule Threaten The Warren Court's Establishment Clause Legacy?, Doug Rendleman
Irreparability Resurrected?: Does A Recalibrated Irreparable Injury Rule Threaten The Warren Court's Establishment Clause Legacy?, Doug Rendleman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury Ascendant: The Rehnquist Court And The Power To "Say What The Law Is", Timothy Zick
Marbury Ascendant: The Rehnquist Court And The Power To "Say What The Law Is", Timothy Zick
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Is Constitutional Law Made?, Tracey E. George, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
How Is Constitutional Law Made?, Tracey E. George, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Bismarck famously remarked: "Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made." This witticism applies with peculiar force to constitutional law. Judges and commentators examine the sausage (the Supreme Court's doctrine), but ignore the messy details of its production. Maxwell Stearns has demonstrated, with brilliant originality, that the Court fashions constitutional law through process-based rules of decision such as outcome voting, stare decisis, and justiciability. Employing "social choice" economic theory, Professor Stearns argues that the Court, like all multimember decisionmaking bodies, strives to formulate rules that promote both rationality and fairness (p. 4). Viewed through the lens …
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
Taking Its Toll: Partisan Judging And Judicial Review, Jeff Broadwater
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Juries, Justice And Multiculturalism, Nancy S. Marder
Juries, Justice And Multiculturalism, Nancy S. Marder
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Teoría General De La Prueba Judicial, Edward Ivan Cueva
Teoría General De La Prueba Judicial, Edward Ivan Cueva
Edward Ivan Cueva
No abstract provided.
The Courts' Inconsistent Treatment Of Bethel V. Fraser And The Curtailment Of Student Rights, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 181 (2002), David L. Hudson
The Courts' Inconsistent Treatment Of Bethel V. Fraser And The Curtailment Of Student Rights, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 181 (2002), David L. Hudson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Movement Toward Federalism In Italy: A Policy-Oriented Perspective, Siegfried Wiessner
The Movement Toward Federalism In Italy: A Policy-Oriented Perspective, Siegfried Wiessner
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
The Adversary System As A Means Of Seeking Truth And Justice, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 147 (2002), Robert G. Johnston, Sara Lufrano
The Adversary System As A Means Of Seeking Truth And Justice, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 147 (2002), Robert G. Johnston, Sara Lufrano
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In The United States: The Need For Federal Legislation, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 229 (2003), Violeta I. Balan
Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In The United States: The Need For Federal Legislation, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 229 (2003), Violeta I. Balan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Treaties And The Eleventh Amendment, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Treaties And The Eleventh Amendment, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Supreme Court's recent invigoration of federalism doctrine has revived a question that had long lain dormant in constitutional law: whether and to what extent federalism limits apply to exercises of the Treaty Power. In the days before the famous switch in time that saved nine, the Court in Missouri v. Holland upheld a statute passed by Congress to implement a treaty even though it assumed that the statute would exceed Congress's legislative power under Article I in the absence of the treaty. The significance of this holding abated considerably when the Court embraced a broader interpretation of the Commerce …
Lawyers On The Auction Block: Evaluation And Selection Of Class Counsel By Auction, Jill E. Fisch
Lawyers On The Auction Block: Evaluation And Selection Of Class Counsel By Auction, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
The lead counsel auction has attracted increasing attention. Auction advocates argue that auctions introduce competitive market forces that improve the selection and compensation of class counsel. The benefits of the auction, the;' claim, include lower legal fees and better representation. Careful scrutiny reveals that auction advocates have overlooked substantial methodological problems with the design and implementation of the lead counsel auction. Even if these problems were overcome, the auction procedure is flawed: Auctions are poor tools for selecting firms based on multiple criteria, compromise the judicial role, and are unlikely to produce reasonable fee awards. Although the existing record is …
Improving Maine’S Justice System: A Significant Effort In Progress: Introduction, Andrew Ketterer
Improving Maine’S Justice System: A Significant Effort In Progress: Introduction, Andrew Ketterer
Maine Policy Review
No abstract provided.
The Paradox Of Delegation: Interpreting The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Catherine T. Struve
The Paradox Of Delegation: Interpreting The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
African Courts, International Law, And Comparative Case Law: Chimera Or Emerging Human Rights Jurisprudence?, Mirna E. Adjami
African Courts, International Law, And Comparative Case Law: Chimera Or Emerging Human Rights Jurisprudence?, Mirna E. Adjami
Michigan Journal of International Law
Though the potential creation of a supranational human rights court has brought international attention to the African human rights system, international law and human rights scholars rarely turn to African examples when studying the domestic application of international human rights norms. This Article seeks to fill that gap by analyzing cases from several Anglophone common law countries in sub-Saharan Africa that invoke international law and comparative case law as interpretive support in their national fundamental rights jurisprudence.
Judicial Activism: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly, Arthur D. Hellman
Judicial Activism: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
No matter how judges are selected, sooner or later some unfortunate candidate will be labeled a "judicial activist." One has to wonder: Does the term have any identifiable core meaning? Or is it just an all-purpose term of opprobrium, reflecting whatever brand of judicial behavior the speaker regards as particularly pernicious? Implicit in this question are several important issues about the role of courts in our democratic society.
I take my definition from Judge Richard Posner, who describes activist decisions as those that expand judicial power over other branches of the national government or over state governments. Unlike other uses …
Textual Imagination, Mary D. Fan
Textual Imagination, Mary D. Fan
Articles
Textualism's revival illuminated the judicial imagination at play behind the search for congressional intent through legislative history. The Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board & Care Home v. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources shows the Supreme Court’s mounting disregard for legislative history and concomitant attempt to erect replacement canons of statutory construction to guide textual interpretation. The opinion privileged a canon of statutory construction over the legislative record of congressional intent. Of more imminent and practical impact, Buckhannon invalidated the catalyst theory of awarding plaintiff’s fees to “prevailing parties” under statutes authorizing private attorneys general to bring …
Magistrate Judges, Article Iii, And The Power To Preside Over Federal Prisoner Section 2255 Proceedings, Ira P. Robbins
Magistrate Judges, Article Iii, And The Power To Preside Over Federal Prisoner Section 2255 Proceedings, Ira P. Robbins
Ira P. Robbins