Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 130 S. Ct. 876 (1)
- 2000 Presidential Election (1)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Citizens United (1)
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (Supreme Court case) (1)
-
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Equality (1)
- Federal courts of law (1)
- Fourth Amendment Law (1)
- Independent politicians (1)
- Justice Brennan (1)
- Justice Marshall (1)
- Law of Criminal Procedure (1)
- Money in Politics (1)
- Political Donations (1)
- Political Spending (1)
- Political science (1)
- Provincial courts of law (1)
- Public Finance Activities (1)
- Public spending (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis Of Independent Political Spending, Douglas M. Spencer, Abby Wood
Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis Of Independent Political Spending, Douglas M. Spencer, Abby Wood
Indiana Law Journal
What effect has Citizens United v. FEC had on independent spending in American politics? Previous attempts to answer this question have focused solely on federal elections, where there is no baseline for comparing changes in spending behavior. We overcome this limitation by examining the effects of Citizens United as a natural experiment on the states. Before Citizens United, about half of the states banned corporate independent expenditures and thus were “treated” by the Supreme Court’s decision, which invalidated these state laws. We rely on recently released state-level data to compare spending in “treated” states to spending in the “control” states, …
"Be Careful What You Ask For": The 2000 Presidential Election, The U.S. Supreme Court, And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley, Joseph L. Hoffmann
"Be Careful What You Ask For": The 2000 Presidential Election, The U.S. Supreme Court, And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, Craig M. Bradley, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.