Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (2)
- Justice (2)
- Access to courts (1)
- Access to juries (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
-
- COVID-19 juries (1)
- Civil justice (1)
- Class-based jury discrimination (1)
- Courtroom demeanor (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Effective representation (1)
- Exploitation (1)
- Gender (1)
- Judging (1)
- Juries (1)
- Jury (1)
- Jury access (1)
- Jury discrimination (1)
- Jury diversity (1)
- Jury reform (1)
- Jury selection (1)
- Law enforcement (1)
- Legal reform (1)
- Misdemeanors (1)
- Peremptory challenges (1)
- Race (1)
- Social psychology (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Benevolent Exclusion, Anna Offit
Benevolent Exclusion, Anna Offit
Washington Law Review
The American jury system holds the promise of bringing common sense ideas about justice to the enforcement of the law. But its democratizing effect cannot be realized if a segment of the population faces systematic exclusion based on income or wealth. The problem of unequal access to jury service based on socio-economic disparities is a longstanding yet under-studied problem—and one which the uneven fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic only exacerbated. Like race- and sex-based jury discrimination during the peremptory challenge phase of jury selection, the routine dismissal of citizens who face economic hardship excludes not only people but also the …
Talking Back In Court, M. Eve Hanan
Talking Back In Court, M. Eve Hanan
Washington Law Review
People charged with crimes often speak directly to the judge presiding over their case. Yet, what can be seen in courtrooms across the U.S. is that defendants rarely “talk back” in court, meaning that they rarely challenge authority’s view of the law, the crime, the defendant, the court’s procedure, or the fairness of the proposed sentence.
With few exceptions, legal scholars have treated the occasions when defendants speak directly to the court as a problem to be solved by appointing more lawyers and better lawyers. While effective representation is crucial, this Article starts from the premise that defendants have important …
2021: How Gender And Race Affect Justice Now - Final Report, Justice Sheryl Gordon Mccloud, Dana Raigrodski, Sierra Rotakhina, Kelley Amburgey-Richardson
2021: How Gender And Race Affect Justice Now - Final Report, Justice Sheryl Gordon Mccloud, Dana Raigrodski, Sierra Rotakhina, Kelley Amburgey-Richardson
Books
In 1989, the Washington Supreme Court’s Task Force on Gender and Justice in the Courts produced a groundbreaking report on the impact of gender on selected areas of the law. It concluded that gender did affect the availability of justice. We – the Washington State Supreme Court Gender and Justice Commission – are a product of that report and its recommendations. Now, in 2021, we have completed our follow-up study.
Our legal and social science research, our data collection, and our independent pilot projects all led us to the same frustrating conclusion about the effect of gender in Washington State …