Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Derecho del Consumidor - Class Actions (3)
- Arbitration Clauses (2)
- Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (2)
- Negligence (2)
- Accion clase consumidores halabi (1)
-
- Anti-suit Injunctions (1)
- Arbirtation Agreements (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration agreements (1)
- Arbitration and Award (1)
- Arbitration award (1)
- Arbitration contracts (1)
- Banking and finance (1)
- Banking law (1)
- Carnival Cruise Lines (1)
- Class Action Waivers (1)
- Class actions (1)
- Commercial arbitration (1)
- Congress (1)
- Consumer arbitration (1)
- Consumer protection law and policy (1)
- Contract Law (1)
- Corporate Defendant (1)
- Corporation (1)
- Court of Justice of the European Communities (1)
- Courts (1)
- Cruise lines (1)
- Cruise ship (1)
- European Union Countries (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Las Acciones De Clase En La Vision De La Corte Suprema De Justicia De La Nacion., Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Las Acciones De Clase En La Vision De La Corte Suprema De Justicia De La Nacion., Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Estas líneas son mis primeras reflexiones sobre el fallo de la CORTE SUPREMA (Argentina) in re Cavalieri, en el cual se denegó a una asociación de defensa de consumidores la legitimación activa para pretender extender la condena reclamada por Cavalieri al resto de consumidores de una empresa de medicina prepaga.
Determining The Proper Pleading Standard Under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Of 1995 After In Re Silicon Graphics , Erin Brady
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
El Acceso A La Justicia Y La Competencia Territorial En Acciones Colectivas De Consumidores., Gabriel Martinez Medrano
El Acceso A La Justicia Y La Competencia Territorial En Acciones Colectivas De Consumidores., Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Comenta doctrina de la Corte Suprema de Argentina que permite la demanda colectiva contra un banco en cualquier jurisdiccion donde este tenga una sucursal establecida.
Reframing The Dilemma Of Contractually Expanded Judicial Review: Arbitral Appeal Vs. Vacatur , Eric Van Ginkel
Reframing The Dilemma Of Contractually Expanded Judicial Review: Arbitral Appeal Vs. Vacatur , Eric Van Ginkel
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
The Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") of 1925 was created to ensure enforceability of agreements to arbitrate. The FAA is the centerpiece of the federal arbitration policy as construed by the Supreme Court. Section 10(a) FAA enumerates grounds on which an arbitral award can be set aside. The central issue discussed herein is whether parties can agree by contract to allow one of the parties to initiate review of the arbitral award by a court that would otherwise have jurisdiction over those parties, or whether the court's powers are somehow limited to the grounds for vacatur enumerated in Section 10(a) FAA. …
An Unnecessary Consternation: An Analysis Of The Future Of Eu Arbitration In The Wake Of The West Tankers Decision, Mark G. Materna
An Unnecessary Consternation: An Analysis Of The Future Of Eu Arbitration In The Wake Of The West Tankers Decision, Mark G. Materna
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
This article proposes that, despite the West Tankers decision, parties are still not free to breach the terms of an arbitration agreement. On the contrary, there has been a strong trend by English courts to find ways of preventing parties from breaching such agreements. In short, this article serves to quell the panic and elucidate that the West Tankers decision is not a nail in the coffin, but rather a mechanism to reiterate European courts' dedication to ensuring that arbitration provisions remain a potent force against economic infidelity. Part II of this article will provide a brief background of anti-suit …
Waiving Rights Goodbye: Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements After Stolt-Nielsen V. Animalfeeds International , Diana M. Link, Richard A. Bales
Waiving Rights Goodbye: Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements After Stolt-Nielsen V. Animalfeeds International , Diana M. Link, Richard A. Bales
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
This article first argues that to determine the enforceability of a class action waiver, courts should take a "totality of the circumstances" approach rather than adopting a bright-line rule. A set of defined factors that also allows courts to consider real-world issues facing litigants will provide a substantial framework for courts to interpret this area of the law and will lead to more consistent and well-reasoned outcomes in the future. These factors include: the probable size of each class member's individual recovery, the potential for retaliation against class members, the awareness of potential class members that their rights have been …
Accion De Clase De No Consumidores, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Accion De Clase De No Consumidores, Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Gabriel Martinez Medrano
Comentario a fallo de Camara de Apelaciones de San Nicolas en autos Consumidores Nicoleños c. BAPRO.
Why Mortgage "Formalities" Matter, David A. Dana
Why Mortgage "Formalities" Matter, David A. Dana
Faculty Working Papers
This Article argues that adherence to mortgage formalities regarding foreclosure is valuable for expressive reasons and also as a potential deterrent to future undesirable underwriting and securitization practices. The Article reviews how some courts have in effect written procedural requirements for foreclosure out of the law, and asks why these courts have done so and whether lenders' behavior might have been improved during this housing crisis had the state courts uniformly afforded equal respect to the legal rights of homeowners and those of lenders.
Cruises, Class Actions, And The Court, David Korn, David Rosenberg
Cruises, Class Actions, And The Court, David Korn, David Rosenberg
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat
As the Carnival Triumph debacle splashed across the national consciousness, lawyers shook their heads. Sensationalist news coverage exposed common knowledge in the legal community: cruise passengers have little recourse against carriers, and, as a result, they often bear the brunt of serious physical and financial injuries. Cruise lines, escaping legal accountability for their negligence, sail off undeterred from neglecting passenger safety on future voyages. While its previous decisions helped entrench this problem, a recently argued case presents the Supreme Court with another opportunity to address it.