Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abdisalan v. Holder (1)
- Aliens (1)
- All Writs Act (1)
- Apple (1)
- Asylum (1)
-
- Background checks (1)
- Board of Immigration Appeals (1)
- Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (1)
- Congress (1)
- Courts of appeals (1)
- Digital security (1)
- En banc (1)
- Encrypted devices (1)
- Encryption (1)
- Executive Office for Immigration Review (1)
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (1)
- Finality (1)
- Going dark (1)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Ninth Circuit (1)
- Premature petitions (1)
- Private companies (1)
- Sensitive data (1)
- Voluntary departure (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Shedding Light On The "Going Dark" Problem And The Encryption Debate, John Mylan Traylor
Shedding Light On The "Going Dark" Problem And The Encryption Debate, John Mylan Traylor
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In an effort to protect the enormous volume of sensitive and valuable data that travels across the Internet and is stored on personal devices, private companies have created encryption software to secure data from criminals, hackers, and terrorists who wish to steal it. The greatest benefit of encryption also creates the biggest problem: Encryption software has become so secure that often not even the government can bypass it. The “Going Dark” problem—a scenario in which the government has obtained the legal authority to search a suspected criminal’s encrypted device but lacks the technical ability to do so—is becoming increasingly common. …
Finality And Judicial Review Under The Immigration And Nationality Act: A Jurisprudential Review And Proposal For Reform, Jesi J. Carlson, Patrick J. Glen, Kohsei Ugumori
Finality And Judicial Review Under The Immigration And Nationality Act: A Jurisprudential Review And Proposal For Reform, Jesi J. Carlson, Patrick J. Glen, Kohsei Ugumori
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), aliens may petition for judicial review of an adverse decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) as long as that decision constitutes a “final order of removal.” Usually it is not difficult to ascertain when an alien should file her petition: the thirty-day statutory filing deadline begins to run when the Board issues a decision that affirms the immigration judge’s removal order in its entirety. In some cases, however, an alien seeks multiple forms of relief from removal in a single proceeding. When that occurs, some forms of relief might be granted, …