Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United States (1)
- Buyer (1)
- Cartel (1)
-
- Cateogorization (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Consumers (1)
- Debtors (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Homes (1)
- In-state (1)
- Injuries (1)
- Intangible harms (1)
- Legislative History (1)
- Long-arm statute (1)
- Market (1)
- Mortgage modifications (1)
- Mortgages (1)
- Nobelman v. American Savings Bank (1)
- Nonresident (1)
- Oligopoly (1)
- Pluralistic competition (1)
- Product liability (1)
- Prohibitory rule (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Residences (1)
- Seller (1)
- Spokeo Inc. v. Robins (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Consumer Protection Law
A Post-Spokeo Taxonomy Of Intangible Harms, Jackson Erpenbach
A Post-Spokeo Taxonomy Of Intangible Harms, Jackson Erpenbach
Michigan Law Review
Article III standing is a central requirement in federal litigation. The Supreme Court’s Spokeo decision marked a significant development in the doctrine, dividing the concrete injury-in-fact requirement into two subsets: tangible and intangible harms. While tangible harms are easily cognizable, plaintiffs alleging intangible harms can face a perilous path to court. This raises particular concern for the system of federal consumer protection laws where enforcement relies on consumers vindicating their own rights by filing suit when companies violate federal law. These plaintiffs must often allege intangible harms arising out of their statutorily guaranteed rights. This Note demonstrates that Spokeo’s …
House Swaps: A Strategic Bankruptcy Solution To The Foreclosure Crisis, Lynn M. Lopucki
House Swaps: A Strategic Bankruptcy Solution To The Foreclosure Crisis, Lynn M. Lopucki
Michigan Law Review
Since the price peak in 2006, home values have fallen more than 30 percent, leaving millions of Americans with negative equity in their homes. Until the Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Nobelman v. American Savings Bank, the bankruptcy system would have provided many such homeowners with a remedy. They could have filed bankruptcy, discharged the negative equity, committed to pay the mortgage holders the full values of their homes, and retained those homes. In Nobelman, however, the Court misinterpreted reasonably clear statutory language and invented legislative history to resolve a three-to-one split of circuits in favor of the minority view …
Antitrust And The Consumer Interest, Kenneth S. Carlston, James M. Treece
Antitrust And The Consumer Interest, Kenneth S. Carlston, James M. Treece
Michigan Law Review
Public control of business in the United States has proceeded, in most sectors of the economy, on the assumption that free, open competition in the market should be the primary regulator. It is felt that consumer welfare will be maximized by such an organization of the economy. Courts, governmental agencies, and, to a certain extent, private agencies have performed the role of ensuring that free markets are not displaced by other, less desirable alternatives.
In Personam Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Manufacturers In Product Liability Actions, Harry B. Cummins
In Personam Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Manufacturers In Product Liability Actions, Harry B. Cummins
Michigan Law Review
A wide divergence of opinion exists regarding the wisdom as well as the constitutionality of extensive jurisdiction through the use of liberally drafted and construed "long-arm" statutes. Hesitance may result from a fear of burdening a defendant with the inconvenience and expense of a foreign suit brought against him solely for the purpose of harassment. While this comment does not advocate the extent to which a court should assert the jurisdictional powers conferred on it by a given "long-arm" provision, it examines the scope of jurisdiction constitutionally permissible over nonresident manufacturers in product liability cases with a view toward formulating …