Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Career (1)
- Circuit split (1)
- Compensation (1)
- DOL (1)
- Employee (1)
-
- Employment (1)
- FLSA (1)
- Factors (1)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (1)
- Glatt test (1)
- Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures (1)
- Image and Likeness; NIL; NCAA; College football; student-athlete; COVID-19; Nationa Collegiate Athletic Association; Fair Pay to Play Act; California Statute SB206; Gavin Newsom; Carnegie Foundtion; college football; intercollegiate sport; amateurism; scholarship; Sherman Antitrust Act; monopoly; Standard Oil v. U.S.; NCAA v. Board of Regents; market; videogames; archival footage; licenses; group licenses; Commerce Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; NCAA v. Miller; contract; legislation; implementation; independent third party; clearinghouse; negotiate; appeal; title IX; (1)
- Interns (1)
- Internship (1)
- Labor (1)
- O'Bannon v. NCAA; Sherman Anti-Trust Act; Name (1)
- Primary benefits test (1)
- Second Circuit (1)
- Trainees (1)
- U.S. Department of Labor (1)
- Unpaid internships (1)
- WHD (1)
- Wage and Hour Division (1)
- Walling v. Portland Terminal Co. (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Consumer Protection Law
The Modern Pay For Play Model: Laws That Protect Student-Athletes' Fundamental Right To Commercialze Their Names, Images, And Likeness, Paul A. Schwabe Jr.
The Modern Pay For Play Model: Laws That Protect Student-Athletes' Fundamental Right To Commercialze Their Names, Images, And Likeness, Paul A. Schwabe Jr.
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
In O’Bannon v. NCAA, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered a permanent injunction against the National Collegiate Athletic Association enjoining the collegiate sports governing body from enforcing limits on student-athlete compensation derived from the use of their name, images, and likenesses rights. The court concluded that NCAA rules unreasonably restrained trade in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, however, neither the court nor the NCAA laid out a framework for lawfully implementing these new economic rights to student-athletes. Since that ruling, only one state’s legislature, California, has attempted to pass legislation to prevent the …
Share And Share Dislike: The Rise Of Uber And Airbnb And How New York City Should Play Nice, Alexandra Jonas
Share And Share Dislike: The Rise Of Uber And Airbnb And How New York City Should Play Nice, Alexandra Jonas
Journal of Law and Policy
Uber and Airbnb are two companies in the emerging “sharing economy” that provide individuals with a means to become entrepreneurs and benefit from a laissez-faire business model. The problem, however, is that while the benefits to users are great, so too are the risks. The dangers of operating without restraint and circumventing existing law are not only potentially harmful to unapprised users, but also adversely affect the continued use of these businesses. Every aggrieved user complaint has the potential for a lawsuit and every violation creates an opportunity for penalties. Left over are attempts by the courts and city government …
Will Work For Free: The Legality Of Unpaid Internships, Nicole M. Klinger
Will Work For Free: The Legality Of Unpaid Internships, Nicole M. Klinger
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
This Note addresses the current ambiguity in the law regarding if unpaid interns are employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Note explores relevant case law throughout the circuit courts, but primarily focuses on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures. It argues that the primary benefits test created by the Second Circuit in Glatt does not adequately protect unpaid interns nor does it inform employers of the standards they need to meet in order to adopt legal unpaid internship programs. Instead, courts should adopt a clearer, more rigid test that finds an intern not …