Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Consumer Protection Law
Troubleshooting Legal Malfunction: Lexmark And Consumer Standing Under The Lanham Act, 48 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2015), Jeremy Rovinsky
Troubleshooting Legal Malfunction: Lexmark And Consumer Standing Under The Lanham Act, 48 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2015), Jeremy Rovinsky
UIC Law Review
This article suggests that the recent Lexmark decision, while resolving the confusion relating to Lanham Act standing requirements, does nothing to protect those most vulnerable—the consumers. Congress must explicitly declare that consumers have standing under the Lanham Act when they have been damaged by purchasing falsely represented goods or services. Section I provides a history of the Lanham Act and illustrates how different courts initially allowed and then precluded consumers from bringing claims under Section 43(a)’s “any person” language. Section II critiques the opinions that have found no consumer standing, including the Supreme Court’s recent Lexmark decision. Section III highlights …
Live Alienation: One Super-Promoter Eliminates Competition, Concert Fans Pay The Price, And The Sherman Act Waits In The Wings, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 527 (2008), Laura C. Howard
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating The Regulators: The Impact Of Fda Regulation On Corporations' First Amendment Rights, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (2005), Lisa M. Fealk-Stickler
Regulating The Regulators: The Impact Of Fda Regulation On Corporations' First Amendment Rights, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (2005), Lisa M. Fealk-Stickler
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Use Or Experimental Use: Are Clinical Trials Susceptible To Another Attack Similar To That In Smithkline Beecham Corp. V. Apotex Corp., 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 149 (2005), Nimalka Wickramasekera
Public Use Or Experimental Use: Are Clinical Trials Susceptible To Another Attack Similar To That In Smithkline Beecham Corp. V. Apotex Corp., 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 149 (2005), Nimalka Wickramasekera
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Balancing Individual Privacy Rights And The Rights Of Trademark Owners In Access To The Whois, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 357 (2004), Jeffrey Stephen Sobek
Balancing Individual Privacy Rights And The Rights Of Trademark Owners In Access To The Whois, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 357 (2004), Jeffrey Stephen Sobek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Developments In Trademark And Unfair Competition Law: In The Courts, The Patent And Trademark Office And Before The Trademark And Appeal Board, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1990), Raymond I. Geraldson Jr., Mark V.B. Partridge, Joseph N. Welch
Developments In Trademark And Unfair Competition Law: In The Courts, The Patent And Trademark Office And Before The Trademark And Appeal Board, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1990), Raymond I. Geraldson Jr., Mark V.B. Partridge, Joseph N. Welch
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trademarks And Competition: The Ives Cases, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 319 (1982), Vincent N. Palladino
Trademarks And Competition: The Ives Cases, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 319 (1982), Vincent N. Palladino
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.